Register

Are the propagators of pseudoscience be unable to challenge their credulity ?

Is This A Good Question? (3)

Add an Answer to "Are the propagators of pseudoscience be unable to challenge their credulity ?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

3 Answers to "Are the propagators of pseudoscience be unable to challenge their credulity ?"

  1. Olafsen - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by Olafsen Jul 7th, 2012 at 8:36AM

    Any sort of proving requires empirical evidence. So far, no mystic has ever been able to do this in any clinical study.

    Like (3)

  2. juliegirlie - 41-45 years old - male

    Reply by juliegirlie Jul 7th, 2012 at 11:46AM

    No doubt that the right method of investigation is not yet discovered....

    Like (1)

  3. Olafsen - 46-50 years old - male

    Reply by Olafsen Jul 7th, 2012 at 11:49AM

    Agreed, but in light of the 21st C and its interests of finding truth to theory its kind of on the back burner to discover evidence of what humans imagine is an alternative to reality.

    Like (1)

  4. winstonwelles - 22-25 years old - male

    Posted by winstonwelles Jul 7th, 2012 at 8:52AM

    The difference between real science and pseudoscience is the degree to which you adhere to the scientific method.

    A proper scientist may well fervently believe that his hypothesis is correct, but will still admit when his studies disprove it, and will accept criticisms of his methodology. If and when he eventually does prove it correct, his findings will be indisputable because they were achieved properly.

    A pseudoscientist believes that proving their hypothesis correct is their job, and will doctor studies, bury unwanted results, and bypass peer review if they think they need to. They might get their story in the press, and make a lot of money, but they get little or no professional consensus, and they use this fact to portray themselves as "mavericks" who the establishment is trying to silence.

    Of course, nobody's perfect, and a lot of scientists allow themselves to be biased more or less towards a theory they want to be correct (the most common problem is performing a study that disproves your point and then deciding not to publish it) -- it's a sliding scale.

    Like (1)

  5. juliegirlie - 41-45 years old - male

    Reply by juliegirlie Jul 7th, 2012 at 11:44AM

    Definition well-known for all (I hope ..)

    Like (1)

  6. winstonwelles - 22-25 years old - male

    Reply by winstonwelles Jul 7th, 2012 at 6:34PM

    I dunno, a lot of adherents seem to believe it's just a slur thrown around by rivals jealous that you managed to get on the front page of the Daily Mail...

    Like (1)

  7. Stephen1967 - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by Stephen1967 Jul 7th, 2012 at 8:42AM

    At least wait till I've had my 2nd cup of coffee before you ask that question!

    Like (1)

  8. Thekidsmom - 36-40 years old - female

    Reply by Thekidsmom Jul 7th, 2012 at 10:24AM

    I've had 3,still not ready for that one.

    Like (1)

  9. juliegirlie - 41-45 years old - male

    Reply by juliegirlie Jul 7th, 2012 at 11:47AM

    @ Stephen... ok, sip coffee, I've got plenty of time..

    Like (1)

    1 more reply

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Are the propagators of pseudoscience be unable to challenge their credulity ?"