Post
In some instances murder can be the right thing, right? I've been thinking about it lately and I have come to believe that it is wrong, no matter who the one being killed is. The act of killing another person is a vicious and cruel cycle that may never end. If a person is "evil" enough, does that mean they have lost their right to live? I ask that question a lot, and then follow with "If so, then who gave us the right to play god?" Vengeance, hate, greed, fear,etc. There are many reasons people would want to kill another human being, but can any of them truly be justified?
KnightOfJustice KnightOfJustice 18-21, M 10 Answers Jan 8 in Community

Your Response

Cancel

Murder can't be justified, any more than hate can be. One wrong doesn't equal another wrong. There's either reverence for all life, or there truly isn't respect for any life. No person has the right to decide who shall live, who shall die, who is worthy of life, who is worthy of death. We're all sinners to one extreme or the other. It's only through God's grace and love that He forgives us. If more people held God in their souls, this world wouldn't be the mess that it is right now. Only God should play God.

Best Answer

"A murderer is only an extroverted suicide"

Best Answer

Murder is wrong. Period.

Best Answer

Murder and vengeance are two completely different things. Not saying vengeance is a good thing, but it is not the same as murder.



Scenario. A man grabs your child out of your backyard, takes her somewhere, rapes and tortures her for a couple of days and then kills her, just for fun. That is murder.



You go through all the pain of loss, and watch the investigation and see him arrested and tried and he get off on a technicality. You go after him and shoot him in the head. That is vengeance.



Would you have killed him if he had never taken your child? Would you have killed him, if the justice system had done its job?



Do you see the difference?

Best Answer

By definition, that is still murder. For murder is unlawfully killing somebody, basically. If you go after someone and kill them, then that is murder, plain and simple. Your intentions are meaningless in the face of the law.

And of course I would, but that is because it would become personal, and I wouldn't give a damn about laws. In fact if something like that happened to someone I loved, then I would not let anyone or anything get in my way. It is still murder no matter how you look at it.

Killing someone in the name of vengeance, or killing someone because you wanted to are both murder. Just because one may have justifications, does not make it right.

Do you see the similarities?

Best Answer

Of course it isn't right, and both people had their own reasons for committing the crime, but the second crime would never happen if the first hadn't happened. Did I say vengeance was right? No, but still vengeance is only murder in the legal definition. And I understand the need for a law that prevents us from killing anyone who killed someone we cared for. That would be a never ending chain of killings. So, yes it is wrong and must not be allowed, but one is understandable, while the other is despicable.

Best Answer

That is horrible logic. By that logic you can just say, if those people never existed to begin with they never would have been murdered. Sounds stupid, yes?

Best Answer

Playing god? Nah. Murder is just wrong. People are just picky on who they decide to kill.

Best Answer

By deciding on who has the right or not to live is basically the act of "playing god".

Best Answer

Yes. Some people should be killed. There are situations in which death is justified. If justified it is not murder.

Best Answer

What exactly would ever be able to justify stealing somebodies life?

Best Answer

self defense the defense of my family's life or the defense of your family's life

Best Answer

There are means of defending yourself or others without taking the attacker/offenders life. Killing them is a rather extreme method of defense.

Best Answer

Wrong. I'll stick to 45 hollow points and you try whatever tree huggers use. Let's see who survives.

Best Answer

Those very intentions are evil, you are aware of that yes? If you have a gun then you can injure them by shooting them in the arm or leg, going for the kill isn't necessary at all.

Best Answer

2 center mass. If the threat is still advancing then here comes 3 and 4. I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by six. Good luck in Hallmark land.

Best Answer

Alright, now you've lost me. I have no idea what you're talking about anymore.

Best Answer
4 More Responses

Some people got it coming

Best Answer

I don't think I could kill anyone... Ever.

Best Answer

I'm not asking if you would ever kill somebody.

Best Answer

Yes, so what in saying is... In my eyes it's never ok to kill.

Best Answer

Never?

Best Answer

For me, no. Never.

Best Answer
1 More Response

um, it tends to be, but murder isn't always wrong, i wouldn't try to argue that

Best Answer

In what way can it be right?

Best Answer

hard to say - the answer requires such broad and deep clarifications, and says so much about the speaker, that it's very hard for that vital discussion to complete a successful journey

Best Answer

i can only think of dry, abstract generalisations, but that stuff usually happens on the ground in the heat of the moment, instantly or from a moment obsessed upon

Best Answer

I know, I just enjoy talking about it.

Best Answer

by various examples presumably?

Best Answer
2 More Responses

Related Questions