police states are what we get when we ask for too much protection.
I do not. I saw a regular police car making a traffic stop and the officer looked like a SWAT member. Seems like they are beefing up the force to a point that it intimidates civilians.
In chicago it maybe necessary considering its the norm for ppl as young as 7 own and use ak-47s, mac 11 ... school aged children are afraid to walk two blocks in fear of being shot yep I think its overdue in some cases...schools being shutdown entire apartment complexes taken over by gangs ...smh it just goes on
The police have to be equally armed as private citizens are. Given that white supremacist and Tea Party groups have been found to be distributing military spec bullet-proof vests through the black market, and they've been found maintaining underground weapons mills where over the counter semi-automatic weapons are converted to fully automatic function, the police really have no choice.
What about them? Why do you think mentioning the name of a liberal group that's devoted to non-violent protest can defuse discussion of the fact that Tea Party confederates are known to be hoarding weapons and IEDs in secret underground bunkers all across the country?
Again, mentioning a group that's engaged in legal behaviors, in the case of the Midnight Special group providing legal aid services for the poor does not defuse discussion of illegal activities by Tea Party Confederates. You're just attempting that pathetic tactic because on conservative message boards it's a way to rile up your fellow Confederates so they go into irate tirades and drown everyone else out with their stupidity.
Since we're throwing out mentions how about an image of the kinds of activities your Confederate forefathers were engaged in:
That's quite a bit different than sit-ins or legal aid.
Explain your logic run. I'm neither white trash, nor am I certifiably insane so I have to ask for a bit of a window into your twisted logic.
It is? Why don't you explain it to me then. Like I said, I'm not a member of the tin-foil hat brigade like you are so my "bat-**** crazy to English" translation skills are a bit rusty. Why don't you enlighten me?
Would you care to actually respond to any of the queries I've put to you, or are you going to play this childish game of just going off on new random tangents and hurling accusations at me because you're afraid of explaining yourself and the real motivations for your comments?
You haven't made any comments, other than a pathetic attempt at that whole "you actually stand fer what you claim you is against" line you said earlier. Other than that you thought you could defuse a discussion of illegal activity by Tea Party Confederates by throwing out the names of liberal groups that have no involvement in any legal activity, because you thought somehow that was a valid statement. When I asked you to clarify your intentions you went off on childish tangents. So far you've just made an idiot of yourself.
Are you going to explain why you thought naming two liberal groups was sufficient to defuse a discussion of illegal activities by the Tea Party? What part of Tea Party logic equates pushing for better environmental protections and providing legal aid for the poor with illegally converting semi-automatic weapons to fully automatic function, and illegally assembling and stockpiling massive quantities of IEDs in underground bunkers? Care to explain yourself on that one?
And once again you go off on another tangent instead of answering the question. You're pathetic.
it couldn't happen here, that's what I'm always told, yet I look around and it has happened.
There just getting handy downs
Prepare for FEMA camps, everybody. You're gonna love 'em.