Do you think an animal cares if you try to have "relations"with it?

I'm going to have a go at this rather than animals in general I'll just focus on dogs. Let's take a look at both cases male and female canine. If we posit the women and dog I think in many cases it's hard to say the dog is being raped. Male animals that are not fixed(even some that are still do) display outward signs of sexuality these are humping and mounting (toys, stuffed animals, peoples legs) and lets not forget smelling private parts. I'm sure most women know that dogs react differently to them based on their cycles too. If a women were to bend over for the dog to mount her she is posturing herself in a position that the dog and understands and interprets as I am open to mating with you. And if the male is interested he does and makes her his *****. So it's hard to say in most situations I can imagine the women is raping the dog. Whether someone one's to call it horrifying sexual act or judge it that it's unnatural well that's complete different. Which I feel one is completely warranted to do but rape or harming the animal I think not...In this case it wants it.
Now if we posit the case of Man and female animal/god. Well that's a different story female animals do not display the outward signs that male dogs do. Sure female dogs animal go through heat but they don't advertise they want humans to engage in relations. They do not act sexual and I would find it bizarre for female animal to position herself way that especially to a human that is asking for sex. I think its more more likely in these scenarios your seeing animal abuse as well something that can be interpreted as unnatural.

So in summation I think that it's very situational in some cases yes animals will mind ie harm done...Other times no it actually wants it...This post is no way condoning or supporting ********** merely just thinking about the question asked.

I'm not certain if it "cares" per se, but there are ethical issues regardless because of issues of harm and consent. Even if you avoid harming it physically (psychologically we are not in a position to know) and the animal doesn't "care", the animal is fundamentally incapable of consent, so it is still wrong. I would argue that having sex with any living thing, whether it comes to harm or not, is morally wrong if there is a lack of consent, and since animals (like children) cannot consent, sex with animals is always wrong. And if anyone disagrees with me, I'd like to see them formulate a position that allows for sex with animals that doesn't also allow for ********** and that doesn't simply make an arbitrary distinction between the two.

Dunno...I DO know that if someone came along and assumed the sale with me,there'd be trouble...

In Tyler We Trust.