i dont see why not? people say "i dont have to be ok with gay marriage" but no one is asking you permission. theyre not marrying YOU, and therefore it doesnt affect or concern you.some really ignorant people in this world its amazing how people are so angry and hateful in the 21st century. but yet homosexuality was common up untill a few hundred years ago... de-evolution at its best.
no way,marriage should be beween a man and women only
In a word, no...
Yes, anywhere adults can marry, it should be legal.
no way, women should marry fish and men can marry sheep.
Adult human beings, who can consent. Animals can not consent, lol.
yes they deseve to be miserable too....
yeah why not? they have a right to live there life just the same way as a heterosexual couple.
Sure! If two people want to be legally and emotionally committed to each other, why should that be MY business?
yes i do live and let live!
No, marriage is between a man and a woman. I was Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve.
So are you going to make divorce illegal?
Mitt Romney is going to ban being gay if he wins.
If that were the case, then why did the opposite happen in Massachusetts while he was governor? It's fine if you don't like him. But, at least post something truthful and rational.
If people want to legally bind themselves to another person, let them. They'll see the crazy later.
Yes. If you think it's a religious ceremony, then there should be no marriage license and the ceremony must be performed at a place of worship and not the J.P. office. <br />
If you believe that it is a gift from God, or that this will destroy the institution of marriage, then you have to make divorce illegal.<br />
Marriage should be between two consenting adults.
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes!!!! I hate how some people have banned it just because they don't agree with it. It's not their life, it's not like they're going to turn gay themselves if they allow it. Love has no eyes and it's selfish how this ban is halting the progression of many gay relationships.
It should be legal only in Upper Darby, Pennsylvania. Illegal everywhere else!!
No way. I feel that marriage for a man and a woman not to of the same. Isn't that even in the Bible--didn't God destroy Sodom and Gomorrah because of all the gay activity taking place?
Hard to say if that was the reason, but Lot offering his virgin daughters to the crowd instead, and then ultimately sleeping with them himself would hardly seem more honourable...would it ? That's also in the Bible.
All immoral sexual activity is a sin weather it be heterosexual or homosexual. any sex outside the marriage of one man to one woman is sin.
We can not call right, what God has called wrong.
Sodom & Gomorrah were destroyed for all their wickedness, which included their sexual immorality.
America should learn from S&G's experience.
Im on the fence but slightly leaning towards the no side.
Absolutely not. They made their choice in full knowledge marriage was not available. And nor should they be permitted to have children, by any method. They chose a combination that does not procreate.
That way they will breed out and disappear. **** and bags.
1) Sexual orientation is not a choice.
2) IVF is currently available to any woman who can afford it, regardless of sexual orientation---so any woman who can bear a child physically, can have children.
3) If being able to procreate was the only justification for marriage, sterile heterosexual adults would also be prohibited from marrying.
Of course it's a choice. Males who can't get a woman choose other ugly males. Women choose women because, well, who wouldn't. Like your third idea a lot. 2 i9s a watse of tazpayers money. Choose a lifestyle and take the pros and cons. Not a bit of both.
That's not logical. No one would deliberately choose to be hated, feared and discriminated against. Most psychologists, sociologists, have concluded sexual orientation is biological and therefore---not a choice.