Idk what a vector field is..But I have sucked .... because I like it..

I have sucked **** for any reason!

Did you ever receive a vector field for it? LIWIC

No but I have sucked c0ck in the hopes of some reciprocation!

No, clitori$ for calculus.

I've never sucked and "c0ck." But more to the point, inasmuch as a vector field is only a mathematical mapping, it is not a conscious being. So, I don't believe that a vector field has a "c0ck" of its own, nor do I believe that a vector field has the capacity to want anybody to suck a c0ck on its behalf. In either case, I would surmise that nobody has ever sucked a "c0ck" for a vector field. <br />

<br />

Or did you mean to ask "Have you ever sucked c0ck and be compensated with a vector field?" Again, I cannot imagine why anyone would accept a vector field as currency for sucking a c0ck.<br />

<br />

Your question is most illogical.

And yet, one can never obtain a vector field. So, perhaps you should suck a c0ck for a corn field or your choice of other grain field instead of hoping for that elusive vector - which points in the direction of unattainable no matter where you are..

? What is a "vector field" ?

In simple terms, a vector field is simply a n-dimensional function of m dimensions - that is, given a set of m numbers, one obtains a set of n numbers.

In 3-space, it is the assignment of a 3-D vector to each point in space. Examples of 3-D vector fields include the electric field, magnetic field, velocity vector in a moving fluid, etc.

What do you mean by "that guy above said?" That is nonsensical. And, it is not a bunch of little arrows! Using your overly simplistic paradigm, the arrow's "size" would be proportional to the amplitude of the vector. Therefore, visually (not symbolically), the representation by arrows in general would include "a bunch of" various-sized "arrows."

Why do you insist on using the adjective "little" yet acknowledge that the arrows "symbolize" magnitude? Your illogical inconsistency is most curious. You obviously are not following well. I suggest that you read my previous post more carefully. If you have the capacity to actually understand the latter two, well-constructed, sentences, you will have the answer to you last question.