Register

Having a family may cost but isn't it better to spend your expenses on those you love rather than live a lone

via versa

Is This A Good Question? (3)

Add an Answer to "Having a family may cost but isn't it better to spend your expenses on those you love rather than live a lone"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

    Best Answer (Chosen by Voting):

    Zebzz - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by Zebzz Dec 23rd, 2012 at 7:28AM

    I used to have a family, a wife and kids but they've all gone now.

    I agree with what you say, apart from I wouldn't want my ex wife back, I do miss being part of a family though instead of gate crashing everyone elses.

    [ Reply ] | Like (2)

4 Answers to "Having a family may cost but isn't it better to spend your expenses on those you love rather than live a lone"

  1. 1blujay - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by 1blujay Dec 23rd, 2012 at 7:29AM

    I can't allow myself to be depressed that I am alone. So I live in my world where I am happy to be alone. But I concede that it would be better to have one I loved.

    Like (2)

  2. madhuratg - 31-35 years old

    Posted by madhuratg Dec 23rd, 2012 at 7:29AM

    Oh! Having a family is not a commercial deal. It is one of the strongest institution in the human society on the roots of which the entire world is running. After money the strongest legal institution is 'Marriage and Family'.

    Like (2)

  3. sadfish - 31-35 years old - male

    Posted by sadfish Dec 23rd, 2012 at 7:34AM

    i can only assume as i wouldn't know, i'm always alone

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Having a family may cost but isn't it better to spend your expenses on those you love rather than live a lone"