It's America, your news is the laughing stock of the world, along with your educational system. At least in places like China the news is about providing information, albeit misinformation; in America it's just another source of entertainment that only really pays lip service to any kind of information. Really it's about taking small issues and ratcheting them up to an emotional pitch far beyond anything that's healthy or likely to produce rational discussion.
It's like "Man crosses road" which on BBC News is like "Man crosses road" on Fox it's "INSANE COMMUNIST OBAMA LOVING NI... PAEDOPHILE RAPIST CAUSES TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, LETS GUN THE GOD HATING ANTI-AMERICAN ATHEIST ****** DOWN AND INVADE SOMEWHERE!!! U.S.A! U.S.A!"
NBC is like "MAN FORCED TO WALK SHOPS TO FEED STARVING FAMILY. WHERE IS THE GOVERNMENT IN ALL THIS? THIS IS ALL THE REPUBLICANS FAULT! OH THE HUMANITY!!" just cuz the dude happened to cross the road to buy milk and a load of bread.
The thing I don't understand is that Americans know this and still watch it and still believe it and still get into daft arguments about it. It's bizarre. It's the free market: as long as you pay them for entertainment and not news they're going to make stuff up to entertain you.
I laughed so ******* hard at the man crosses road translation.
I'm giving serious thought to going into politics actually. XD
why does it matter if he's racist or not. He stalked a teenager, started a fight with him, and shot him. If I did that, I'd be in jail...especially if I disobeyed the police operator...It's not like he can say he didn't know he wasn't to go vigilante on the kid. She told him not to.
I don't base my assessment on the talking heads...I could care less what the think. But the tape of his conversation with the operator is quite clear. He was told not to get further involved. If he had listened he wouldn't have been in a position to shoot anyone. which means, he caused the conflict which resulted in someones death. That's a crime no matter his reasons. I don't care about his reasons or anyone else's with all this crap about it being important in reference to these new laws and such, No, he shot someone, he could have avoided shooting by listening to the authorities. He's a criminal. And so are they for not prosecuting him.
why? I don't don't make my living making a circus out of someone getting shot, that's for sure! These people should be ashamed as far as I'm concerned...and it angers me a great deal that they don't even apply basic logic. It's sick people using the death of this child, and it happens soo much much now when there's a violent incident involving a youth.
but even in his own story, he hadn't caught him doing anything and he was following him. You can't do a preemptive strike. If they stopped letting over excited people like him have guns maybe they wouldn't have such crime problems. I really think your priorities are out of line if you think people's political stances and stupid reporters are more significant than the fact that he shot an unarmed child. Yes, there are incompetent cops everywhere, how does shooting some teenager change that?
if people had the right to shoot everyone acting a bit off there'd be bodies everywhere. The fact that they haven't made an arrest at this point, now that there is a huge media frenzy is not that surprising. There's so much attention now that lots of organizations are involved that when they finally make a choice it'll be really picked over so they've got to have all the evidence lined up neatly, especially now that they are dealing with impropriety charges of the case being mishandled and the detective wanting to charge him and all.
how is that an argument? he's the one that brought the gun, so if the boy grabbed it that would have been in his self defense. I mean this guy was following someone with a loaded weapon! Even if it happen as you say he said, he caused this.
well, they haven't concluded anything yet so perhaps it should be left at that.
jeanemae You are accusing Zimmerman of being an vigilante and from what I have read here you are guilty of exactly the same thing, You seem unwilling to let the professional investigators and a Grand Jury discover the facts, especially if what they discover doesn't jive with your preconceived notions. That's the mentality of a lynch mob.
As opposed to the media that blindly repeated 'ENHANCED VIDEO SHOWS INJURY" without even bothering with a forensic on the video.
Which still proves nothing because Zimmerman STARTED the fight by bringing his gun to an illegal stop leading to an engineered confrontation.
There is NO DEFENSE AFTER STARTING THE FATAL FIGHT.
The pictures of both bothered me too. It looks the news shows had no problem showing not recent photos of the kid (the football uniform bothered me and he hadn't played football in what two years) while continually to post the mug shot of the man that was like seven years old. If that isn't blatant misuse of trying to give out "unbiased" facts, I don't know what is.
Your right wing nonsense bothers me no end. Try thinking for yourself.
Coming from the person who discounted my comment because they thought I was a liberal. You fail.
You are an idiot. I never mentioned right vs. left, YOU did.
This is ALL ABOUT RIGHT AND LEFT as the right is interested in maintaining a 'right to kill on sight' any young black man who is 'threatening looking'.
That could be a good start to a song, Twyla.
I would say someone at NBC is not too bright. How would they think they could have gotten away with it. It certainly hits NBC News where it hurts most : their credibilty.
Who is Erik Wemple, and why should I believe him?
The news station does not like people thinking for themselves. So they alter or report different things so that their viewers will think what they want them to think.
That is an opinion backed up by a Fox news 'expose'.
I'm not a liberal. I am, however, someone who gets their news from multiple sources and those sources are rarely ever from the TV. The tv news sources keep trying to pretend they are reporting 'just the facts from an unbiased perspective' while being simultaneously reliant on the salaciousness of the news for advertisement revenue.
There is a CLEAR conflict of interest and thus I am much more interested in news that comes from people who are open an honest about where they are coming politically and financially.
Example: Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, New York Times, London Observer, The New Yorker, The Economist, The New Republic (post Stephen Glass), etc.
I also did not see citations linking to a FULL RECORDING of the 911 tape they are 'referencing'.
You are wasting your breath snap , these idiots don't read.
Agh. You have no FACTS to back up your FACTS. You don't have the original call, you cannot know what was said and what was made up and you are taking what was written on a BLOG to be NEWS. ****. Stop breeding, now.
What? Peza has cognitive skills! No.
There is no defense for removing portions of the tape IF the intervening portions put the remaining material in context.
There is no evidence this happened.
NBC clipped meaningless qualifications from the declaration "I think he is black", the best example of the mindset, indeed the mens rae, of Zimmerman.
It will be played at his trial, should the DA ever decide to do his plain duty.
take all news stories with a grain of salt............most of that s hit fabricated
So what??? Every part of the media is pandering to the lowest common denominator...this is just the newest way of doing do for them...
I think it should be forced upon them to sue NBC
If it takes a RIOT to force the DA to act lawfully and responsibly, handing Zimmerman over to a jury to try the facts and decide on his guilt, then a RIOT IS A GOOD THING!
Guess they will be joining Faux News Network
Fox has repeatedly forged evidence, been caught, AND REFUSED TO ISSUE APOLOGIES.
Thus you see the difference between right and left.
Doesn't surprise me one bit, they have been slanting the news for decades.
If you think that NBC is the only network doing this, then I got a bridge to sell you. None of what I see on tv is news that was obtained by actual reporting or journalist activity. Fox is probably the worst, but I've seen slanted stuff on CNN as well. Think for yourselves. At the end of the day, only a gullible person would believe that big *** Zimmerman who was recorded on the 911 line chasing some kid was ever acting in self defense. He beat up a cop before and was simply a nutty law enforcement wanna be. He's probably left the country or if not, will ultimately get away with it. Sad to say, black men and boys' lives in America, and other places in the world, are of no value to society at large. Reverse the races, and there probably, definitely would have been an arrest followed by charges. Anyone who blames the victim is a sick racist **** and there's no hope for you....my only comment on this...not caring if I'm offensive right now.
I rarely say this in such a discourteous way, but go and re-read the facts of the case and the timeline then comment. Not to do so confirms your lack of intelligence critical thinking skills. If you don't follow my advice, you'll continue to publicly expose yourself as member of the association of sheeple that lap up to every bit of misinformation and divisive rhetoric right wing taking heads spew on fox and talk radio. If you are in fact a paid troll, try huff po.
...and just because I'm in that sort of mood...twyla, not even going to where I can always find an individual with a name like that....**** off.
Unsurprised. All of the mainstream media is horseshit. Liberal or conservative leaning, it doesn't amtter. They're all terrible.
That said, Mother Jones (which is admittedly left wing) has FAR better reporting on the Zimmerman shooting.
In this case those screaming for instant ( vigilante ) justice all seem to be on the political left, why is that. This is just another example a leftist news media. Editing a 911 call in order to make it fit their agenda is the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theater .
i think that it got thier rating up. isn't that what news progroms want to do. it is up to us to not take a newsersons word as gospil.
It also doesn't mean that you have to tel the whole story a fact that the major news networks are very good at taking advantage of.
Twyla you should know by now that liberals hate Fox news because it tells the truth about them and truth is not their friend,
Civil Unrest is NECESSARY when confronting the enabling of conspiracy to permit a white murderer to walk away without punishment.
Oh, btw, that quote is from U.S. v. Debs, when the Supreme Court said it was constitutional to lock up a candidate for President who dared disagree with war policy.
NOT a very good choice for you anti-first-amendment types!!
I think it was terrible how they edited that tape. Learning what was really said makes much more sense actually. It is my understanding that NBC is doing an internal investigation on this. I bet that they are surprised that they got caught actually.
Not really sure about the facts in this case, but NBC has a long history of bending the truth, particularly with dateline. Their bit on the Suzuki Samurai comes to mind.
I'm so used to major news networks altering evidence, showing footage of incidents that happen in a completely different place and time and claiming it to be the here and now, reporting views from certain people only, and basicly the whole mainstream media propaganda that it doesnt bother me any more
It used to frustrate me badly when I watched the news knowing half truths and sometimes blatant lies were being reported. I used to feel like screaming "how the **** can you say that, anyone with half a brain can hear that doesnt make sense" It happens all the time and there's nothing someone like me or you could ever do about it.
That is why mainstream media is so powerful, and that is why it will always be controled by the propagandists. All your mainstream media puts a spin on the news which suites a agenda. Never just the plain facts
You can't fool all the people all the time but you can fool some people all the time, and those are the ones one needs to concentrate on.
Not sure who said that, maybe Bush
Oh really? Is that the side that demands that CORPORATIONS be allowed to use worker's money to flood the airwaves with rightwing propaganda and so silence THE PEOPLE?
Hint, because you are a dense lying sack of ****, CITIZEN'S UNITED!!
NBC didn't admit that. Looks like you are twisting the facts.
Opening an investigation is not making an admission.