Register

I want to know is there a difference between getting spanked on the underwear or bare bum in pain.

I cannot believe you not ask a question here without people getting mad. It interesting that people can give there answers like I was asking strange question but like at the site we are at

Is This A Good Question? (15)

Add an Answer to "I want to know is there a difference between getting spanked on the underwear or bare bum in pain."

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

26 Answers to "I want to know is there a difference between getting spanked on the underwear or bare bum in pain."

  1. Serenitree - 66-70 years old - female

    Posted by Serenitree Nov 24th, 2011 at 1:02PM

    This is posted in a parenting group, so I am going to assume it is a fair question about child discipline. Personally, I don't care for spankings. But, if a spanking is going to happen, then it is best given with the clothes on. This is not because of a pain factor, but when you remove their clothes, you add a humiliation factor into it. If however the child is already bare and has done something that you feel calls for a spank, it would be silly to go hunting for clothes to put on them before giving them a swat. Almost as bad as taking off the clothes they have on in order to spank them.

    Now, if you are talking about spanking as part of sex play, then I have no opinion about that whatsoever. It was never part of any relationship I had. The men who wanted to hit me weren't playing.

    Like (4)

  2. ItsGabiSweetheart - 18-21 years old - female

    Reply by ItsGabiSweetheart Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:43PM

    I love this answer so much. Why remove clothes? It makes them embarressed! But of course, if the kid is in the tub or something... why go hunt for clothes? Thats silly. Love this answer!! :)

    Like (1)

  3. BlogDog - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by BlogDog Sep 13th, 2011 at 4:24PM

    Slapping a bare butt stings the most and is most likely to cause redness. You'll notice that your hand will sting too, so the feeling is shared although a child's butt is more sensitive than an adult's hand so it hurts them more than it hurts you. However, the act of hitting your own child will cause more emotional pain to you than it will to the child. It's common for a parent to say to the child; "this hurts me more than it hurts you." How hard you hit and how you cup your hand will have an effect on how much pain it causes too. Cup it to follow the butt's curve and that will hurt like the dickens!

    Each layer of insulation you add (underwear, clothing, gloves, mittens, etc.) between your hand and the target butt reduces the pain and chance of causing redness. Too many layers turns out to do nothing more than produce a muffled thump with no pain and no redness. At that point there's no point in spanking them because it's effect will be naught.

    My dad used a leather belt on our bare fannies when we were teens, so that hurt a heck of a lot more. But after we hit a certain age, we simply stopped screaming and took the pain in stride. That's when my dad stopped hitting us. It was no longer useful to do so.

    Having said all that, I still wonder if it makes sense to spank a child. I was spanked so I think nothing of it. But I think about spanking my child when he makes me angry, and that may be because I was spanked as a child. If my parents used a different method, would I still be thinking about spanking my child rather than using some other method? Hmm.

    Like (3)

  4. ofjndji - 26-30 years old - male

    Posted by ofjndji Jan 26th, 2012 at 5:03PM

    I think spanking children is wrong because it's humiliating and painful, but I also think that sometimes young adults and adults need a good spanking and then it's right to give it because as adult you can understand why you are getting punished. I deserved some spanks and I got some pants on, then slips on an then bare bottom. I can assure that even if you are grown up like me (i'm 25 and still occasionally receive disciplinary spanking), after a while you scream for the pain. Bare bottom is really worse than any other condition. It depends also by the implement: when I got spanked with hand, belt or rope, it was much better with slips than naked, but for paddle or hairbrush honestly I didn't feel it so different. Of course jeans protect better in any case. Since spanking are for disciplinary reasons, I think it's better to give them on the bare bottom, so that the punishment can be really hard. Moreover, if 2 persons have to be spanked at the same time, only the bare bottom conditions allows equal treatment, because even different kinds of underwear could advantage one of the 2.

    Like (2)

  5. dlferris2012 - 61-65 years old - male

    Posted by dlferris2012 Oct 12th, 2011 at 11:52AM

    It really depends on what you are wearing. Most male clothes are thick enough that you can notice the difference. Having been spanked wearing thin nylon panties, I would say that there is no difference.

    But if you are punishing someone, it really should be done on the bare so you can see how much damage you are inflicting. After all, we do not want to cause permanent injury.

    Like (2)

  6. ProfDavros - 46-50 years old - male

    Reply by ProfDavros Jan 28th, 2012 at 1:49AM

    Interesting. I'd be keen to know what you are looking for to ensure no phsical damage occurs? What psychological damage assessment do you recommend?

    Like (1)

  7. dlferris2012 - 61-65 years old - male

    Reply by dlferris2012 Jan 28th, 2012 at 11:37AM

    there are two different types of spanking, and to simplify it I will just call them spanking adults and punishing children. For assessing damage, the results are the same. You look for cuts and potential bruising. Both are possible even when you are just using your hand. And this I think is a good reason for bare bottom spanking, if all you see are the clothes than it is easy to lose track of how much spanking you have done. As far as psychological damage for punishing children, I think that the parent's (or even teacher's) attitude before and after the spanking is far more important than anything that would be done during the spanking. Constant nagging, harping, and criticizing is far worse than a spanking in terms of psychological damage. Also not teaching a child that there are serious consequences for their actions causes a different kind of psychological damage. I did not spank my children when they were growing up. I now wish I had spanked my son. But I also realize that it was an attitude that was given to him by my first wife and his teachers that is the cause of his problem today. It would have been better if I had spanked him.

    Like (1)

  8. BennDover - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by BennDover Sep 3rd, 2011 at 11:26AM

    If you were a female I would have shown you.

    Like (2)

  9. gmckdude711 - 22-25 years old - male

    Posted by gmckdude711 Apr 3rd, 2013 at 8:28PM

    I don't understand why a bare bum spanking isn't considered assault

    Like (1)

  10. BlueMetalChick - 18-21 years old - female

    Posted by BlueMetalChick Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:33PM

    I wouldn't know really...I've never been spanked. My parents used to beat me in the face with a PVC pipe instead. Dumb bastards, coulda killed me.

    Like (1)

  11. DAW2012 - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by DAW2012 Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:38PM

    O I am sorry to hear that. I was only spanked twice by my parents the rest of the time I was beaten.

    Like (1)

  12. BlueMetalChick - 18-21 years old - female

    Reply by BlueMetalChick Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:41PM

    I stopped my parents from beating me after I got older, I socked my dad full force in the head and broke the bone in his eyebrow. I cracked my hand from the force of the punch though,

    Like (1)

    1 more reply
  13. positionforspanking - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by positionforspanking Jun 24th, 2012 at 7:39AM

    I was fairly bare bottom spank growing up. Yes, bare bottom spanking stings more also longer. Yes, a person remembers their bare bottom spankings longer,too! I tend to think, a bare bottom spanking offers the parent to visually check the hinney their smacking thus preventing bruising; not preventing reddness.

    Like (1)

  14. BlueMetalChick - 18-21 years old - female

    Reply by BlueMetalChick Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:41PM

    You misspelled they're. You spelled it as their.

    Like (1)

  15. munan - 26-30 years old - female

    Posted by munan Jun 1st, 2012 at 8:41AM

    of coure bare bottom more painful.pain plus humiliation you get.my step mom usually will asked me to put my hand on my head.if not she will give extra spanking.then she take off my jeans and panties.and asked me to bend over the couch.she spank me with the belt until she see blue black or bruised then she will stop..

    Like (1)

  16. tripdelta3 - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by tripdelta3 Apr 29th, 2012 at 8:27AM

    THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. Most of my spankings were on the bare hiney - usually by my mom with a fly swatter, ruler or hairbrush.

    Like (1)

  17. jh777 - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by jh777 Mar 1st, 2012 at 9:56PM

    Depends. At high-school, I got paddled over thin gym shorts over a jock=strap. At home, I got paddled on the bare. With a regular paddle, it didn't make much of a difference. With a paddle with holes, then on the bare will raise a blister over the bruise and often break the skin

    Like (1)

  18. litelover - 36-40 years old - male

    Posted by litelover Mar 1st, 2012 at 4:30PM

    i have experienced that mostly from my father a few from my mother and once after 10 years old from my father i called him a terrible name and got smacked worse in the face that time up to 25 smacks hard it hurt bad and i was told to never disrespect grown ups again their repect from me was mandatory i owed it to them but desserved none back as i was considered very low on the family social scale so besides that i got emotional and verbal spankings too

    Like (1)

  19. spankchicago - 31-35 years old - male

    Posted by spankchicago Feb 15th, 2012 at 11:17AM

    90% of the spankings I received were on my bare butt. I don't think underwear adds that much padding, but I think it would probably depend on the implement

    Like (1)

  20. OrionsSword - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by OrionsSword Jan 29th, 2012 at 11:49PM

    bare skin spankings usually leave welts, which means the pain last a long time. obviously that is more painful,and shouldn't be done. the issue isn't pain, or shouldn't be, it is discipline.

    i agree with those who stated it is also much more emotional if bare skin. the purpose again is discipline, not humiliation.

    always spank with clothing on.

    Like (1)

  21. ProfDavros - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by ProfDavros Jan 21st, 2012 at 1:06AM

    Why?

    Like (1)

  22. BILLZALOT - 56-60 years old

    Posted by BILLZALOT Jan 1st, 2012 at 4:40PM

    Yes, in addition, a parent can also judge when to stop!

    Like (1)

  23. ProfDavros - 46-50 years old - male

    Reply by ProfDavros Jan 28th, 2012 at 1:51AM

    How do you judge? What training courses are there available for parents to learn to do this so that no hazard occurs to the child? I'd presume while inexpert, you'd practice on your partner and vice-versa before using your "skills" on a small child?

    Like (1)

  24. Endofmyrope91 - 36-40 years old - female

    Posted by Endofmyrope91 Dec 21st, 2011 at 12:08PM

    My parents believed in 'spare the rod spoil the child' and my sibling and I had many spankings (fully clothed) and we grew up fine. I however have tried to always use the 'time out' method, 1 minute/age..(3 minutes for 3 year old etc) for older children I find that extra chores and taking away privileges works pretty well. Definately not sending a kid to their room...they love that! so much to do!

    Like (1)

  25. socalifdesertguy - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by socalifdesertguy Dec 14th, 2011 at 12:16AM

    i never gave my kids a spanking i made them stand in the corner for 5 minutes then as they got older the time they had to spend in the corner went up but they are all good kids with kids of their own,but with me i always got spanked on my bare bottom my step dads and my real dad said it was to teach me a lesson but aftefr awhile i started to like being spanked so they stopped doing it now i have a friend who makes me take down my levis and he gives a good spanking every week.

    Like (1)

  26. mytsi - 36-40 years old - female

    Posted by mytsi Nov 10th, 2011 at 8:00AM

    I always got spanked bare and usually with a hairbrush it hurt I reckon it would hurt either way

    Like (1)

  27. pinkie5549 - 61-65 years old - female

    Posted by pinkie5549 Oct 30th, 2011 at 6:25PM

    I have no idea, I was never spanked as a child and was only smacked twice - and I grew up into a law abiding citizen with no hang ups and problems. Without kicking off a debate I'd say I don't believe in spanking etc as solving anything. Ok' maybe a lot of people do, but those are my views.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "I want to know is there a difference between getting spanked on the underwear or bare bum in pain."