If we look at it through the lense of theoretical physics, couldn't telling the future be possible and destiny exist?
If the past, the present, and the future theoretically all exist and time, like other dimensions in space, can be traveled forward and in varying velocities, wouldn't visions of the future, like staring into the horizon in one direction except not seen through the eyes, be within the laws of physics and quite possible? Also, does that mean that fate can be as real as we consider the events of the past to be?
Related Questions to If we look at it through the lense of theoretical physics, couldn't telling the future be possible and destiny exist?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "If we look at it through the lense of theoretical physics, couldn't telling the future be possible and destiny exist?"
4 Answers to "If we look at it through the lense of theoretical physics, couldn't telling the future be possible and destiny exist?"
Posted by DiscoveryChick Jan 28th, 2012 at 1:17PM
Possible? Yes. But even our greatest thinkers have been working through the filter of humanity, and humanity's experiences. We are so small and insignificant and can't even stop wars yet - essentially, so much more narrow-minded than that of which we can conceive - even our most brilliant stars together equate to nothing more than a puff of smoke in the ether.
My sense is, no. We cannot travel through time nor see time, in *either* direction, but rather it's a fallacy born of previously mentioned filters...we think we can, but we cannot because of information of which we yet have no inkling.
Then again, what the the hell do I know? I'm a freaking management consultant.
I'll take a cup of tea, thanks, Rodney.
Like (1)
Posted by cariaga Jan 28th, 2012 at 12:44PM
micheal hukaku ones said if you travel fast in a car everything around you is slow and in your pace its fast so in theory you are basically traveling in time do you get it?
another scientist ones said, dimension are segments from a dimensions just stack from one another in space, and the 4th dimension is consider time while it could be anything left unproven, but what we know is from 1st to 3rd 1d is a line,2d is a square while 3d is a cube so a 3d can only feel the presence of the 4d cuz we can only see a portion of a it in 3d,so if a creature from the 4d world contacted with us it would be like seeing spirits with 4d vision and sound that what they say because our brains can only understand 3d but a 4d creature can see our entire body without problem.
so what does this dimensions got to do with time well the higher the dimension the higher the speed/frequency it can travel it can travel.
micheal hukaku said that it is completely impossible to travel back in time cuz we can only go forward so it means we wont have a teleport to send back in time because we didnt have a teleporter in the past
Like (1)
Posted by BiggTony Jan 28th, 2012 at 12:30PM
I don't think it's possible for the future to already exist. If the future already exists, then there would have to be a sub-timeline or an infinite amount traveling on one timeline. One or multiple amounts would already be written (nothing more than a repeat of occurrences) and the other waiting to be written (the main timeline.) Therefore the main time line would be a reality where a prediction of future would be impossible because this is where time truly exists and the other(s) would be nothing more than redundancies.
In other words, there would be multiple copies like looking at your reflection bouncing back between two mirrors....but there is only one real you.
Like (1)
Posted by goliathtree Jan 28th, 2012 at 12:12PM
I bet you got an A in rectal math!
Like (1)
Reply by goliathtree Jan 28th, 2012 at 12:31PM
Like (1)