It could be said the same of President Obama thinking creating more jobs in the government sector is a ideological sound idea. If we hire more teachers, firemen and policemen, that this a going to solve something. Shutting down coal fire electric plants, stopping development and building of oil pipelines and drilling off shore may help the environment but perhaps it should happen at a later date in the future when we get the economy sorted out first.

Best Answer

TwylaMarie you're arguing with a post, their minds are made up and they don't want to be confused with the facts. If Karl Marx himself were running against 0bama they would find some way to label him a capitalist operate raider.

Best Answer

He was the least funny of the Marx clan. Apparently the excesses of the industrial revolution drove him to craziness (child labor, unsafe conditions, etc.).
Another thing about Marx was that he hated "liberals." Why? Because they were willing to listen to the other side, believing that reasoned debate would lead to solutions. He would find a great deal in common with the current crop of right wingers. It should not be forgotten that the first non-aggression pact between Germany and the Soviet Union was between Hitler (a right winger) and Stalin (a communist). Both were authoritarians. Both loved giving orders and having them obeyed without question. Both LOVED firing people (figuratively and literally).
If Karl Marx were running against President Obama, he might win because of the haters and the white racists....

Best Answer

Hitler a right winger! You can't be serious , He was the head of the National Socialist Workers Party, NAZI for short in German. 0bama has shown his authoritarian leanings by skirting congress once again and granting amnesty to illegals with a unconstitutional presidential decree. Not in a class with Stalin and Hitler yet, but he's trying.
.

Best Answer

Yep. I think it is a sign of a sociopath to take successful companies (KayBee Toys for one) leverage the purchase to burden them with debt at 100 times the purchase price, pay those funds to your investors, and then force the company into bankruptcy. How is it that somebody who worked to squeeze money out of companies and then discard them could be looked upon as a success?<br />
<br />
I find it cute that conservatives here tie themselves into pretzels bringing Obama into it as if that excuses the insane cruelty of the wealthy - - - and then go and vote against their economic best interests.

Best Answer

Gotta disagree. At the time of the Bain acquisition they were well positioned as a storefront specialty retailer, or at least the Wall Street Journal thought so. Good cash flow. My, how conservatives have selective memories.

Best Answer

The REAL icing on the sludge cake of Romney's "I-know-business" argument is that the government (in the form of US taxpayers) had to step in and come up with funds for employees who had lost their pensions. That's the part (W)Rongney never mentions....

Best Answer

The US government (taxpayers) got to pick up the tab for the lost (stolen) pensions of companies that (W)rongny had a hand in killing. That's something he NEVER mentions, nor do his syncophants.

Best Answer

I know who i would believe---Bonny and Clyde.

Best Answer

Care to hear some of the tales of people whose 401Ks and pension plans were raided? What about the pension plans of the people who lost their jobs because of Bain's takeover.
Oh wait a minute, Bain GOT THE GOVERNMENT TO BAIL OUT THE PEOPLE IT CHEATED!!

Best Answer

Yup.

Best Answer