nope, I would sell all my possesions and wander the planet
yeah and with youtube these days you could be famous. or ask a rich person for a million to fund it and just live
I can't have them anyway. I'd have to adopt.
I think that adopting is better than having one of your own. I think it's better because there are kids that are already born and need a loving family. You gotta know where to look and of course, you should always know the history of the birth parents. ..of course, this is just my opinion.
No. I would need at lest 24 years.
Enough time to see them to an independant age. I would hate to leave a 15 year old in this world to fend for themselves.
naaahhh..... I would invest the money in crusing the world...doing a lot of other things that I can focus on....<br />
+ When I am gone ..I don't want him/her to left alone thinking that I was a selfish person
I already did, so a moot point for me. But ...depends on the situation. I would need more information.
No i would not, but if you are being pressured by family to do so then that could be a nightmare.
That's what my doctor said that I still have at least 15 years to live! I told him he's contradicting what a gypsy told me! As for children I was thinking no but I'm really undecided I think I can handle one!
If I had 15 yrs left, whats the point?
My answer is, I wouldnt want to leave the children without a mom