Post
Experience Project iOS Android Apps | Download EP for your Mobile Device
again, you can't say you would not choose. You are being forced. Pretend you are being held hostage and if you don't choose 3 cities, they will bomb 6. By choosing you will save lives. It must be cities with a population of over 75,000.
bitterdregs bitterdregs 46-50, F 18 Answers Nov 7, 2010

Your Response

Cancel

Mmmmh, I think the 2 that have already have been nuked is more than enough.

Best Answer

by not playing, they have now nuked 6 cities instead of 3. you are responsible for the extra 3 cities that have been nuked. There are times altruism can be deadly.

Best Answer

I wouldn't recommend nuking any cities, but I guess the safest thing would be to bomb three cities in an isolated area, like Japan.<br />
<br />
Well, it's isolated from Europe at least.

Best Answer

Well to quote MR. Spock, “the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few” so I would pick the 3 least populated cites.<br />
Vatican City – population 826<br />
Tuvalu – population 12,373<br />
Nauru – population 14,019<br />
Cheers!

Best Answer

What a very interesting question Special Agent Bitterdregs ;)

Best Answer

pr0pwash9<br />
<br />
Lol. LOLOLOL<br />
<br />
"Pakistan iraq india"<br />
<br />
Pakistan: 170 million<br />
Iraq: 31 million<br />
India: 1.18 billion<br />
<br />
Not only are these not cities (they are entire countries), you have just nuked over 1,380 million people (one fifth of the worlds population) which is 6000 x more people than you needed to have killed.<br />
<br />
Seriously, I'm impressed.<br />
<br />
I vote China, India and USA.<br />
<br />
I win!

Best Answer

This one , this one , this one <br />
<br />
<br />
Neuilly

Best Answer

If someone was "forced" to choose and decided to decline, regardless of the psycho's threats; there would be no fault for that person.....except the personal guilt they would feel because of people like you and the terrorists. The guilty would still be on the hands of the instigators. <br />
<br />
If these idiots were threatening such a thing, who is to say that they wouldn't still do so (or worse) after you gave them your list? Can you really trust the word of these people? Here is the thing....once you gave them your list; there may be some guilt on your part depending on what your motivation is for naming these cities. <br />
<br />
So, you never answered your own question, which three cities would you choose? Since you wanna accept the responsibility for their choices... I am curious, are you gonna name the city you live in? Maybe it will be a city, in which you have lived and know someone but now hate? Hmmm.....what are you gonna ba<x>se your choices on?<br />
<br />
And if, after you give them what they want and if they don't keep their (honorable) word and destroy even more cities than original plan of six cities...would that, then make you responsible? What responsibility would you have in that?

Best Answer

Paris, (because I hate the French) <br />
Jerusalem. (Because if they are going to fight over it all the time, nobody is going to have it. <br />
And Harare. So that Mugabe gets it.

Best Answer

I don't know enough to be able to even answer this question. What cities have such a population and what cities are available in other countries? Does it have to be in my country or could it be anywhere in the world? One of two outcomes--I would either choose the cities at random out of a hat or something, or I would simply choose cities only in violent foreign countries with oppressive governments.

Best Answer

Whichever ones hold the most terrorists/terrorist supporters.

Best Answer

I'd rather die a martyr than knock out thousands of innocent people..

Best Answer

you did not read my stipulations.

Best Answer

According to your stipulation it would have to be London, Paris ,, and Tehran.<br />
*what a question.<br />
Echelon will pick this up for sure!

Best Answer

I won't be complicit in any way with murder. I would pray for GOD's help and do my best. If I was going to try to hurt anyone, it would be those who were putting me in that situation.

Best Answer

Pakistan iraq india

Best Answer

I would generate a random number table and use that to decide. I hope I never have to make that decision and then live with it.

Best Answer

If I had to choose, which is hard to imagine, then I guess it'd be three with very small populations.

Best Answer

Related Questions