Mmmmh, I think the 2 that have already have been nuked is more than enough.
I wouldn't recommend nuking any cities, but I guess the safest thing would be to bomb three cities in an isolated area, like Japan.<br />
Well, it's isolated from Europe at least.
Well to quote MR. Spock, “the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few” so I would pick the 3 least populated cites.<br />
Vatican City – population 826<br />
Tuvalu – population 12,373<br />
Nauru – population 14,019<br />
What a very interesting question Special Agent Bitterdregs ;)
Lol. LOLOLOL<br />
"Pakistan iraq india"<br />
Pakistan: 170 million<br />
Iraq: 31 million<br />
India: 1.18 billion<br />
Not only are these not cities (they are entire countries), you have just nuked over 1,380 million people (one fifth of the worlds population) which is 6000 x more people than you needed to have killed.<br />
Seriously, I'm impressed.<br />
I vote China, India and USA.<br />
This one , this one , this one <br />
Paris, (because I hate the French) <br />
Jerusalem. (Because if they are going to fight over it all the time, nobody is going to have it. <br />
And Harare. So that Mugabe gets it.
I don't know enough to be able to even answer this question. What cities have such a population and what cities are available in other countries? Does it have to be in my country or could it be anywhere in the world? One of two outcomes--I would either choose the cities at random out of a hat or something, or I would simply choose cities only in violent foreign countries with oppressive governments.
Whichever ones hold the most terrorists/terrorist supporters.
I'd rather die a martyr than knock out thousands of innocent people..
According to your stipulation it would have to be London, Paris ,, and Tehran.<br />
*what a question.<br />
Echelon will pick this up for sure!
I won't be complicit in any way with murder. I would pray for GOD's help and do my best. If I was going to try to hurt anyone, it would be those who were putting me in that situation.
Pakistan iraq india
I would generate a random number table and use that to decide. I hope I never have to make that decision and then live with it.
If I had to choose, which is hard to imagine, then I guess it'd be three with very small populations.