Post
BloviatingBuffoon BloviatingBuffoon 70+, F 16 Answers Dec 28, 2012 in Community

Your Response

Cancel

What's the difference? One gets paid for s3x, and the other...gets paid for...uh...s3x...

Best Answer

My understanding is that, more and more, the movies are like motion picture business cards for people whose primary business is prostituti0n.

Best Answer

There is not much difference . Its being paid to have $ex the camera is the only difference really.

Best Answer

I wouldn't, because my co-stars would have the kind of medical tests and examinations that the public never gets.



I'm not either, by the way...

Best Answer

if you were in fact a star, you wouldn' _need_ to.

Best Answer

i don't think so. i'm too proud to take orders in bed

Best Answer

no its all right to be a pornstar if you need money ,,,

but once you get into that field people look you on the other way ,,

which may drag you to become a prostitute

so if you be a pornstar there are chances of becoming a prostitute,

myself i would enjoy becoming a pornstar

Best Answer

I would if there were pornstars or prostitutes w/tiny penises that also wore diapers.

Best Answer

wtf....

Best Answer

**** star? I think of myself more as a **** diva!

Best Answer

**** lord!

Best Answer

I'd be a gigolo!! :D

Best Answer

Sometimes they have a tendency to go hand in hand.

Best Answer

or...d.ick in hand?

Best Answer

No. It's a lot less safe to be a prostitute. Pornstars at least know their life won't be in danger when they approach a shoot, also they are relatively safer as far as getting an std. Being a prostitute you're pretty much putting yourself out there to whatever comes your way.

Best Answer

don't know about that John Homes would disagree with you he died of aids

Best Answer

hhmmmmm usually!

Best Answer

Related Questions