What's the difference? One gets paid for s3x, and the other...gets paid for...uh...s3x...
My understanding is that, more and more, the movies are like motion picture business cards for people whose primary business is prostituti0n.
There is not much difference . Its being paid to have $ex the camera is the only difference really.
I wouldn't, because my co-stars would have the kind of medical tests and examinations that the public never gets.
I'm not either, by the way...
if you were in fact a star, you wouldn' _need_ to.
i don't think so. i'm too proud to take orders in bed
no its all right to be a pornstar if you need money ,,,
but once you get into that field people look you on the other way ,,
which may drag you to become a prostitute
so if you be a pornstar there are chances of becoming a prostitute,
myself i would enjoy becoming a pornstar
I would if there were pornstars or prostitutes w/tiny penises that also wore diapers.
**** star? I think of myself more as a **** diva!
I'd be a gigolo!! :D
Sometimes they have a tendency to go hand in hand.
or...d.ick in hand?
No. It's a lot less safe to be a prostitute. Pornstars at least know their life won't be in danger when they approach a shoot, also they are relatively safer as far as getting an std. Being a prostitute you're pretty much putting yourself out there to whatever comes your way.
don't know about that John Homes would disagree with you he died of aids