Register

In case you have not heard (in other words if you watch American Media) Irael bombed Media offices of several networks..

including RT. Then instead of apologizing the spokesperson of the Prime Minister of Israel sent the RT offices telling them if they don't air pro Israel coverage they are fair game. Why is this war crime not even covered in Western media and should every journalist who says something Israel doesn't have to worry about getting blown up? So much for freedom of press or free speech.

Is This A Good Question? (9)

Add an Answer to "In case you have not heard (in other words if you watch American Media) Irael bombed Media offices of several networks.."

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

    Best Answer (Chosen By Asker):

    englishsteve - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by englishsteve 1 Nov 25th, 2012 at 6:10AM

    The first instance of a media-bombing strategy I can recall occurred at the Palestine Hotel, Baghdad, 2003, when a US tank drew up and fired into the 14th floor to destroy al-Jazeera facilities. Reuters and Spanish tv cameramen were amongst the fatalities. The hotel was well-known as a centre for international media personnel. The same 'shoot the messenger' policy seemed to be at work when another Reuters crew were machine-gunned in the street by an Apache helicopter. If the strategy is to simply terrorise independent media off the Baghdad - or Gaza - streets it hasn't worked yet: there will always be journalists with far more courage than the crews of that tank and helicopter.

    [ Reply ] | Like (3)

  1. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 6:13AM

    Sad but true. It seems this war crime is becoming common practice in the US and Israel. The two nations that always get a free pass on war crimes.

    Like (1)

  2. thequeenofeverything - 18-21 years old - female

    Reply by thequeenofeverything Nov 26th, 2012 at 10:06AM

    this is sad.

    Like (1)

9 Answers to "In case you have not heard (in other words if you watch American Media) Irael bombed Media offices of several networks.."

  1. reynov8 - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by reynov8 Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:12AM

    The Zionists own the western media. For my news I watch RT and TRNN.

    Like (3)

  2. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:15AM

    I get my news from RT myself and is the only reason I ever heard about this.

    Like (1)

  3. thequeenofeverything - 18-21 years old - female

    Reply by thequeenofeverything Nov 26th, 2012 at 10:06AM

    me too, I watch Al-Jazeera as well

    Like (1)

  4. peza - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by peza Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:08AM

    Any dissenting voice is a legitimate target for the zionists in the propaganda war.

    Like (3)

  5. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:12AM

    Sad but it would seem to be the case.

    Like (1)

  6. SilenceEvermore - 18-21 years old

    Posted by SilenceEvermore Nov 25th, 2012 at 6:00AM

    "The first fact left out by The Times was that the western media had left the area a week ago, so the IDF didn’t target “the media” as The Times uncritically allowed the Hamas operative to claim.

    Secondly, The New York Times somehow forgot to mention that the buildings that were hit also housed the base of four high profile terror leaders, all four of whom were killed in the strike.

    Killed that day was Islamic Jihad senior commander Ramiz Harb. Also eliminated was Bahu al-Ata and Hallil Bahatini, two Islamic Jihad commanders who were in charge of the rocket barrage launched against Israel, and Taysir Jabari, a terror commander responsible for multiple attacks on Israel.

    Last weekend, for instance, Palestinian propagandists and gullible western media outlets touted the death of 4-year-old Mahmoud Sadallah, supposedly killed by Israeli rockets. But it turns out that the child was actually killed by a Palestinian rocket launch that went awry falling on its own people instead of soaring into Israel killing Israeli women and children. Naturally, the truth was pushed to the back pages."

    Like (2)

  7. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 6:09AM

    If that is true why did the spokesman for the Israeli PM claim nobody was killed in the strike and the only reason for the strike was to damage the Antennas to silence them and the IDF openly admitted they knew full well that there were journalists inside. The injured 8 journalists including blowing one journalist's leg clean off. If the Israeli government is saying they killed some militants and there were no casualties at the same time something is a bit off? Especially when the aid to the PM sends an email to the RT office in Moscow saying they deserved it and if they don't change their coverage they are fair game. Look a little deeper.

    Like (1)

  8. SilenceEvermore - 18-21 years old

    Reply by SilenceEvermore Nov 25th, 2012 at 6:15AM

    They took over a Hamas propaganda air wave and told them that they were going to attack the base, warning the people. They are unapologetic because those injured were already warned to leave and they didn't. Perhaps when they claimed there were no "casualties" they meant civilian casualties. Not sure about that e-mail, would have to look into it more, sounds like BS.

    Like (1)

    14 more replies
  9. tone77 - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by tone77 Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:28AM

    **** Israel

    Like (2)

  10. reynov8 - 56-60 years old - male

    Reply by reynov8 Nov 26th, 2012 at 2:35PM

    WOW. What an intelligent answer. Are you on crack or crystal, whatever, go back to your pipe.

    Like (1)

  11. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 26th, 2012 at 2:39PM

    Ad hominem attacks like that show even less maturity and a complete waste of intellect. Pot meet kettle.

    Like (1)

  12. YBlah - 41-45 years old

    Posted by YBlah Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:05AM

    Saw it on BBC. They bombed where foriegne journilists gathered

    Like (2)

  13. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:10AM

    Well kudos to the BBC for growing a spine.

    Like (1)

  14. YBlah - 41-45 years old

    Reply by YBlah Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:16AM

    The Brits are beginning to report much differently these days. It takes a while to tell people all about whats going on and not just some of whats going on

    Like (1)

    6 more replies
  15. Boxersoff4u - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by Boxersoff4u Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:27AM

    I'd suggest that the various media tell the Hamas not to shoot rockets from next door or the roof of their offices and/or not take advantage of sheltering thier men in the same building.
    Its about time the same media show the real picture of how the Hamas have no red line of using ANY kind of civillian human shield, whether it innocent families, hospitals, schools or .... media office building.

    Like (1)

  16. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:35AM

    I figured someone would jump in to justify yet another war crime by Israel. I swear some people have permanent blinders on. Do some research. Even israel does not claim that there were militants in the building and readily admit they were deliberately bombing journalists. The Israeli government does not need your help making up excuses for their actions.

    Like (1)

  17. englishsteve - 41-45 years old - male

    Reply by englishsteve Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:54AM

    Hamas will know that their situation is better served by live reporters than dead ones. Do you have specific instances of media offices being used as 'shields'?

    Like (1)

    7 more replies
  18. Frazzill - 46-50 years old - female

    Posted by Frazzill Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:12AM

    it's all propaganda now and news has turned into entertainment. theres no more indepth reporting or investigtive journalism. i called into a radio show they were doing on weather and global warming- they had a guy on who studied climate change for the last 20 years i asked what he thought about chemtrails and if it was affecting the weather. i was rushed off the air so quick my head spun- he changed the subject didn't answer the question and I was hung up on! Now if they really wanted accurate reports wouldn't they have WANTED this specialist to answer the question?

    Like (1)

  19. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:29AM

    Sad but true for the most part. I don't buy the chemtrails thing based on my own research but it certainly does not mean you don't have the right to question things. That was definitely not handled well.

    Like (1)

  20. Rooneytoones - 31-35 years old - male

    Posted by Rooneytoones Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:06AM

    does any of that surprise you?

    Like (1)

  21. DreamsForTheFuture - 31-35 years old - male

    Reply by DreamsForTheFuture Nov 25th, 2012 at 5:09AM

    The bombing, not at all. The media blackout this side of the Atlantic does. I did not realize a country halfway around the world could dictate media coverage here.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "In case you have not heard (in other words if you watch American Media) Irael bombed Media offices of several networks.."