Register

Is breaking the law morally wrong? Are there any exceptions in your mind?

Is This A Good Question? (7)

Add an Answer to "Is breaking the law morally wrong? Are there any exceptions in your mind?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

10 Answers to "Is breaking the law morally wrong? Are there any exceptions in your mind?"

  1. rolo65 - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by rolo65 Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:19AM

    God's law and the 10 commandments yes, the rest of it was made up bu man and insurance company lobbyists.

    Like (3)

  2. BigbadGus - 36-40 years old - male

    Posted by BigbadGus Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:18AM

    Stupid laws are meant to be broken. Marijuana prohibition for example.

    Like (3)

  3. Lazarus12 - 26-30 years old

    Posted by Lazarus12 Jan 2nd, 2013 at 10:10AM

    I'd say it depends on the law. While their are many laws that tend to line up with generally percieved notions of morality, by majority, most do not. I drank well before I was 21. I didnt consider that immoral then and I don't now. One ALWAYS finds exceptions.

    Like (2)

  4. TheBaychimo - 18-21 years old - male

    Posted by TheBaychimo Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:32AM

    In New York, it is illegal to wear slippers after 10:00 PM. This is a real law.

    Like (2)

  5. eyes - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by eyes Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:19AM

    Breaking the law is morally wrong - unless the law is immoral, or unless it is necessary to protect someone from clear and present danger. There are some exceptions, but few. People like to stay stealing a loaf of bread - but unless you have attempted honest ways to obtain food, then it is still immoral. If you have tried working, asking, shelters, etc, and still are starving, then you are protecting yourself from the clear and present danger of starvation. however, you steal sustenance, not a soda.

    Like (2)

  6. tjschira - 22-25 years old

    Reply by tjschira Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:27AM

    Wait so I find this very interesting. I understand the premise, and I understand the why with the stealing example it applies. But why does having a glass of wine at 20 count as an immoral act. Stealing takes from others, so that's different. Is the fact that something is made law enough to change the moral boundaries around an act? Was it moral to have wine at 18 until the mid-80s and then it ecame immoral? Can a moral act in Toronto be immoral if repeated in Chicago?

    Like (1)

  7. eyes - 31-35 years old - female

    Reply by eyes Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:33AM

    A law is a social contract. Laws that are moral and just are set up to protect the people. The laws concerning alcohol are a hotbed topic, I know, considering people in other countries drink at much younger ages than in the US. However, it was considered to be, in part, a safety issue. And alcohol has a detrimental effect on the body until it is fully grown, and that doesn't typically occur in males until their early 20s. Remember, in he 1800s, slavery was also legal - so the legality of something does not mean it is moral. The differentiation is that putting an age limit on imbibing alcohol is not inherently immoral - and it is part of the laws of this country - part of our social contract - and thus should be followed, and enforced.

    Like (1)

  8. Lushiro - 18-21 years old - male

    Posted by Lushiro Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:18AM

    Some laws are made to protect people, others are to manipulate them. I suggest pairing them with how this reality is set up.

    Like (2)

  9. Wintersorrow - 22-25 years old - male

    Posted by Wintersorrow Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:39AM

    Never been the same thing in my opinion and view. Laws are often stupid really. But its a generalization that is supposed to just work in general for people. Its never adjusted to spesific cases in any sence. Its much like stereotypes, would never be anything that would fit everyone.

    Like for example, law says you cant steal. If you come to a point in your life you have to steal food to survive, either for yourself or perhaps your kid even. There is nothing wrong with that in my opinion, the law however says basicly you should die instead.

    Like (1)

  10. ellision13 - 22-25 years old - male

    Posted by ellision13 Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:29AM

    depends on what law your breaking i suppose

    Like (1)

  11. luckylassie - 51-55 years old - female

    Posted by luckylassie Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:25AM

    usually the laws correlate to morality but i think there are rare exceptions both ways sometimes the law is immoral.

    Like (1)

  12. linklock - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by linklock Jan 2nd, 2013 at 6:18AM

    Never is right to disobey the government. They can fix all that is wrong, just give them time and money or you will go to jail.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Is breaking the law morally wrong? Are there any exceptions in your mind?"