Is the UN anything more than an agent for the USA?
Related Questions to Is the UN anything more than an agent for the USA?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "Is the UN anything more than an agent for the USA?"
9 Answers to "Is the UN anything more than an agent for the USA?"
Posted by RojoJeepNut Jul 30th, 2012 at 12:07PM
The U.N. is an Agent of Enslavement. it is a Communist Innovation, long known to be one of the Tenents of Tyranny. You must always keep up the vigil to do away with such organizations that seek to disarm Nations, and Run their lives.
NATO.... is the Military portion of the U.N.. This is the "Force" behind their Philosophy. The U.N. is a United States Democratic Party Dream, to attempt to control other Nations, but it has backfired, as those Nations, in partnership are more experienced than the U.S.A. when it comes to Tyranny and Communism. The U.S.A. is the Outcast of the U.N. We are the subject, and Target of Conquest for other, third world nations to use our Wealth to support them, and Impower them to take over other Nations, to become Communist. Thus, the goal of a "One World Economy and Government" will become the Goal, of Tyrants.
Like (4)
Reply by califdom Jul 30th, 2012 at 12:43PM
Like (1)
Reply by winstonwelles Jul 30th, 2012 at 6:38PM
Like (1)
Posted by originalmadman Jul 30th, 2012 at 4:48PM
UN=USA in a poor disguise
Like (2)
Posted by DreamsForTheFuture Jul 30th, 2012 at 1:46PM
I think that is what the US expects it to be and throws a hissy fit every time the UN does not do what they tell them to. But agent of the US describes NATO perfectly. NATO has become the auxiliary forces of the US Military with other countries footing the bill. That is why NATO is doing all the fighting now because the US is broke so those of us that were coned into NATO are footing the bill for current and future US military adventures.
Like (2)
Posted by wuliheron Jul 30th, 2012 at 12:41PM
The UN has struggled to find it's role for decades, but addresses crises such as famine and refugees is one of the its more important roles. Even the US will seldom oppose such actions no matter how much it might privately oppose them. The fact that at one point the US threatened to withdraw from the UN altogether is testament enough that it is not merely an agent of the US, although there is no denying the US has much more influence in the UN than any other country by far.
Like (2)
Posted by califdom Jul 30th, 2012 at 11:55AM
How do you come to that conclusion?
Like (2)
Posted by Lifeiscalling Jul 30th, 2012 at 4:27PM
An agent for the USA? your kidding of course right?
If they were then why hasn't the UN gone in and taken care of Syria?
The UN blames the US for everything and allows the second rate country's to bad mouth us in the UN, but when the UN needs something done correctly who do they turn to? The US, I say kick the UN out of our country and put them in Afgan or Syria and see how long they last.
Like (1)
Posted by roadtooblivion Jul 30th, 2012 at 12:09PM
or Useless Nerds as they are sometimes known !!
Like (1)
Posted by HeartLikeAChild Jul 30th, 2012 at 12:04PM
Just like the US used to be a loose collection of independent States that is now "top down" controlled by the Federal Goverment, the world is a collection of independent COUNTRIES ...that the UN wants to control "top down".
Basically, the UN is trying to get the countries of the world to become "States" in one large "global, one whole world" ..."Country".
Like (1)
Posted by FoggyKoala Jul 30th, 2012 at 11:54AM
I don't know much about this stuff, but isn't that NATO?
Like (1)