Vietnam, they already did
Israel. It will beat the US in a war using the US weapons supplied to them for free.
Israel already kills any US citizen "dares" to oppose it using the US weapons, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they tried beating the US in a war - Poor US, they don't know what they are doing!
Are you serious? Lol. Everything is nuclear so just count the ones with nukes
Israel would never attack unless of course Obama screws that up.. But as for the rest they have enough to reach important bases and some key points.
Afghanistan has beaten everyone who tried so far. Including us, although since we've decided to be a presence there forever that would mean that the war will never end because neither side has a decisive victory. However, then you have to figure in the cost and it's pretty much destroying our country, so, yeah. We're losing.
Mexico they already have over run us!!!
China would be the only one
The reason we lost to Vietnam , the US did not fight it like a real war. (this is fact) Johnson and Nixon escalated it and did some of the biggest lies about not admitting to bombing Laos and Cambodia. Sent our men in and didn't let them fight it like it should have been fought. So in the end we lost because of that.
The US does have a lot of artillery, and it would be a heck of a battle if we did go to war. But in the end if we went to war with China or Russia I believe we (the whole world) would come out losers. (just my opinion)
So you have a crystal ball on what to happen next? If we went to war with another super power country it would be the end of civilization.If it escalated to nuclear. The nuclear war would cause plants to die and people around us would die off from radiation poisoning either from direct exposure or having no way to clean food or water properly to eat or drink. In the end all would lose.
Hmmm...sounds like many of our last engagements, Iraq, Afgan, ...our Government puts some many rules of engagement on our troops, you mine as well send in the Cub Scouts to fight..
Its very sad. But true.
if it where a conventional war as was WW2 i would say there could be several, as we are not made of the same stuff as back then.and other such as china, russia,and these tough middle eastern fighters have shown to be very effective. but with todays technology and superior air and navel power that the U.S. has no one, but if it where a prolonged war i am not sure, the U.S. can no longer produce as they did in WW2.....
Russia has a good chance, Germany has the scuentists
Militarily speaking, none. Several superpowers would have to team up.
On this planet Earth, it would take the next 4 - 5 militaries combined to give the USA a run for its money...
China. I often hear my brother speak of their populace.
Depends what sort of war you are fighting ! As someone mentioned here One such war US has already lost to vietnam!
Russia or China.
I believe they can. US has been curbed regarding military innovation.
Then how do you know about them?
Russia, China, Viet Nam, and those countries on the middle east aren't doing so bad, with their 3rd grade education, and rusted AK's.
China is overpopulated, they have so many people, that they can just throw wave, after wave of people, killing a lot of them, but their will still be a lot of them left. They could win by sheer numbers.
US strategic 9,170 Atomic Bombs
US non-strategic 1,225 Nuclear Bombs
Russian strategic 7,622 Atomic Bombs
Russian non-strat. 5,100 Nuclear Bombs
UK 260 Nuclear Bombs
France 450 Nuclear Bombs
China 400 Bomb
Israel 100-150? Not sure on the exact number or if they're Thermonuclear though.
India 70 Nuclear Bombs
Pakistan 44 Nuclear Bombs.
Depends on the war. With all the "rules" to war now. War is for the most part irrelivent.
I know I irrelevant wrong. :(