I don't recognize his authority as a non American and a muslim on top of it after what they did on 911! He is my enemy like all towel heads!
This is absolutely rediculous speaking that, in the 1st Amendment under the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land, people have the right petition and outlined in the Declaration of Independence, it states that if if the government becomes oppressive, it is the responsibility of the people to overthow it. Sooooooo there is absolutely no way that a highly educated man would ever think of signing a bill that takes away freedoms of the people. It is unconstitutional. Also, even if he did sign the bill, since when can the president do whatever he wants? There are a series of Checks and Balances between the 3 branches of government that help eliminate the issue of one branch becoming too powerful. It certainly would have been shot down by legislative and judicial branch. Next time, make sure you are reading information that is reliable and not from a website like, www.obamaf*ckingsucks.com. You are welcome.
This is a minor step towards a police state, but it's still a step. No matter who you get at the end of the year, they are going to continue this trend.
Not a good law, but not a new law. Read through http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/hr-347-get-the-truth.html for more info. Likely you won't though.
So you just have problems with the amendent to this law? Did you have any problems with the law prior to today?
Here is HR347: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text
And here is the federal law section that specifies who the Secret Service can legally guard/protect.
And they have to report each protection detail at the end of the fiscal year. if they lied about protecting someone, they break the law. They may not have to tell US who they are protecting, but they have to tell their oversight panel. Those panels are usually staffed if the majority party in the house and senate who, at the moment, are republicans. You can rest assured that if the Service breaks the law while a democrat is president someone is going to be screaming about it. Especially in an election year. Politicians in an election year are a lot like 5 year olds. Tattling on each other and a lot of "did not" "did too" going on.
Your information came from where? Please state the Title and Code of that law.
This has to do with Federal grounds and buildings:
‘‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ means any
posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area—
‘‘(A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice
President’s official residence or its grounds;
‘‘(B) of a building or grounds where the President or
other person protected by the Secret Service is or will
be temporarily visiting; or
‘‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event...
Public protest cannot be restricted.
That would be in direct violation of our constitutional rights and I do not believe you for a second.
What I think is going on here is that you are trying to start a rumor going around and I will not be part of it.
I'm here cause I want to hear the feedbacks :)
my frappuccino has baby cells in it D,:
and I can't stop drinking ET! D,:
IT'S LIKE SLURM! but worse! O:
Perhaps he has something in mind for us?
Thomas, if you hate this so called police state, then move. You sound like Baby Boehner who cried yet again the other day.
That alone is a racist statement, you idiot. Obama could've been purple , and I would've voted for him. Fiona? You have some bigoted male prejudice against my name? God, you're a moron.
Obama and Hitler can kiss my ***. I live in the U.S.A. NOT THE USR.