Shorts with pockets but no fly, are they for: male? female? or both?
1 Answer to "Shorts with pockets but no fly, are they for: male? female? or both?"
Related Questions to Shorts with pockets but no fly, are they for: male? female? or both?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "Shorts with pockets but no fly, are they for: male? female? or both?"
Best Answer (Chosen By Asker):
Posted by ServeMistressP Jul 1st, 2011 at 1:03PM
Both, My slave. Most of the athletic shorts My male partners have worn fit this description. I believe the designers decided a fly wasn't necessary because the men would probably also be wearing a jock strap. Since they would need to pull the waistband of the shorts away from the body anyway to free their **** from the athletic supporter when they needed to pee, the fly was useless and omitted.
The question of gender-specific clothing is so foreign to Me anymore that I sometimes forget I am part of a small minority who find the designation of certain items of clothing as mens' or womens' to be more annoying than helpful. But I guess that's what happens when You admit You are addicted to the beauty of seeing a man wearing gorgeous silky panties and a matching bra...especially when he is aroused...
[ Reply ] | Like (2)
Reply by MPsslavetommy Jul 4th, 2010 at 9:34PM
Like (1)