Depends on the situation. If he has done anything seriously bad to you or the child, then HELL TO THE **** NO! If nothing else, he had a hand in creating them, he should have one in raising them. Too many fathers abandon their children for kids to just be going without one. But if did anything serious( abuse them or you, alcoholism, raped you) then he needs to stay away
Custody of children should always go to the father & that same father should take that responsibility nobely. Women generally have poor social skills outside of their commodity given them by God. A child needs a social education more than anything.<br />
Case by case it goes of course; however, i would always give the father the benefit of the doubt because of the built in bias in the court system which allows even crack ****** to walk with their children over responsible fathers. Then the father is set up to support a system run by feminest militants.
Yeah & a judge in Georgia said he always gives custody to the mother cause he hain'ty never seen no calf foller no boel. You dumbass ******* think your commodity gives you the right to steal children from the family home even when the father was the principal. I bet you're so pure you make nuns look like ******.
Their commodity you dumbass given by God not their social skills.
Just as much as a biological mother. Our society has worked very hard to diminish the role of fathers in children's lives but the fact is that studies always show that time with fathers has far more impact on children than the time with mothers does. A nuclear family of course is preferential for child rearing as it is obvious in it's design. Please don't ask me any "what if" questions regarding this as anyone can make a case against or for individuals i am just trying to cover the topic as a whole.
Excellent answer & I concur with you. The matriarch has tried to penetrate & has no legs on this topic. If women had no ***** there would be a bounty on the *******. Ladybug is so pure she makes a nun look like a *****.
yes, if they show respect to you and the children.
if they really care for their children and never abuse them then yes the fathers should have the right they helped create them so its time for them to manup and take reponsibility for the kids,now if the dads are real creeps and abuse the kids then forget it keep the kids as far away from the *** as you can.
On that basis alone, no.
Absolutely, unless there is something seriously wrong with them.
No. Just my opinion if they weren't there from the begining to support the child why be there now.
It depends...on the way they're treating their child.
If they are good fathers yes. If he's an *** to you that shouldn't stop him from seeing the child. Unless he's abusive. Of course most fathers have rights in most states. In 32 states even a rapist has right to the child. ****** right?
If they want to have a relationship with their children then yes. You made the choice to have sex with them and if they want to be a part of their kid's life, they have as much right as you do.
Should biological mothers for the same reason?
...any parent, not just men, should be judged ba<x>sed on their character, actions, efforts and resources and not just on gender or genetics; plenty of human being out there who should not be allow to breed nor have the child that they already have..