Should people in the process of a divorce flaunt a new bf/gf?

No good can come of it and it may be cited in a legal case. Once it's all over with then sure date you you feel like ad take matters from there.

I think he should wait until the ink is dry....not only is it disrespectful to his wife of many years, who happened to give him several children....but, also it's wrong. He's legally still married, and to me, he is comitting adultery (not that it would be the first time, if the tabloids are correct). He must be such an embarrassment to his kids.

No. Have some self respect and patience. Some people are so grossly needy that they can't wait til the divorce is final.

I've been separated. I chose NOT to date, because of morals. My husband had an affair and began inviting HER to his family functions. Not only have we overcome the affair, but my husband made a HUGE a** of himself and his girlfriend.

He looked like a fool to our friends, family, and our children. Of course everyone played along when he was around, but they would call me and say, "What was he thinking? He's still married." Now, it's a situation he has to live with.

So, no. Don't flaunt him/her. They may not say it to your face...but, they will talk behind your back.

Its sheer bad taste to flaunt her....especially as its such a public divorce......3 years or not.

His wife gave him SEVEN children,....she deserves more respect and ALL HIS !

I hope the new floozy falls on her arse

Out a sense of propriety, either or both parties should not do this until the divorce has been finalized. There is a Spanish term for this, "delicadeza" or the sense of shame for what's proper or improper.

. 'Flaunt' or 'flagellate'?

If it's been 3 years--not an issue-it's between he and the soon to be ex-wife--and the media as we all know--(as well as small communities--LOL) feed on this stuff. If he and the ex are trying to keep things amicable--and again--beens seperated 3 years before media got ahold of it--he's fine--

Here's the real question: Does a person WANT to? If so, why? The only motivation would be to hurt or get back at the other person. And if the first person wants to hurt the second person, that usually means the first person still feels hurt by the second person. So the first person maybe still needt to work out some pains & issues that happened with the person they are divorcing - whether it's by talking TO that person or someone else - unless the first person would like to carry some additional baggage. I think the first person is better than that. ; )

absolutely not