Should psychopaths (the ones who turn into serial killers) be given the death penalty?
since our prisons are so crowded anyway and it's expensive to keep them in there. it would save us a lot of tax money that could be spent on better things and rehabilitation doesn't work for them.
Related Questions to Should psychopaths (the ones who turn into serial killers) be given the death penalty?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "Should psychopaths (the ones who turn into serial killers) be given the death penalty?"
8 Answers to "Should psychopaths (the ones who turn into serial killers) be given the death penalty?"
Posted by fxckup Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:47PM
they should be sentenced to life, and people in prison for things like marijuana possession and other non-violent crimes should be released or put on house arrest or probation to deal with overcrowding.
Like (2)
Reply by thequeenofeverything Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:47PM
Like (1)
Posted by kbgloves1 Oct 14th, 2012 at 12:10AM
"thou shalt not kill" chica
Like (1)
Posted by hhansen Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:41PM
I don't believe in the death penalty in any case. But we could do a lot to improve our prison system and it purpose concerning rehab. Maybe not with insane or career crims, but there is surely a lot of improvement that can be done in other areas.
Like (1)
Posted by BarvoDelancy Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:40PM
No no no no no. Few reasons.
1. The death penalty is more expensive than life in prison.
2. Revenge is a foul motive.
3. The state has no right to execute its own citizens, or should have no right.
4. Pyschopaths and serial killers don't just "happen" - there are complex social reasons why a place like America has such a problem with spree shootings and serial killers. Death penalty puts the focus on individual acts, and away from fixing the **** that creates these people in the first place.
Like (1)
Reply by thequeenofeverything Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:42PM
Like (1)
Reply by BarvoDelancy Oct 14th, 2012 at 12:20AM
Like (1)
Posted by beecha21 Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:40PM
F*** yeah! they are a treat to mankind :)
Like (1)
Posted by klaatu888 Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:37PM
Hypothetically: yes
amed for murder(s).
In reality: No. I think killing one innocent person is much worse than killing ten guilty people. The justice systems of the world are always flawed and I don't think we should risk innocent people getting fr
Like (1)
Reply by thequeenofeverything Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:40PM
Like (1)
Reply by klaatu888 Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:42PM
Like (1)
Posted by ratskolnikov Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:36PM
It's really hard to diagnose... institutionalization and rehabilitation would be better
Like (1)
Reply by thequeenofeverything Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:39PM
Like (1)
Posted by inblues Oct 13th, 2012 at 11:36PM
Yes !
Like (1)