Should students be held legally responsible for bullying if it resulted in the victim's death?
16 Answers to "Should students be held legally responsible for bullying if it resulted in the victim's death?"
-
I think we know my opinion ba
sed on my other comments. It would be nice, but I don't think it can happen adequately. Kids these days are too exposed and you cannot adequately determine who the bully is and why. Also, you're asking about students - why are we not charging the adults for neglect? What about teachers who see bullying going on but don't do anything about it? Or the parents who don't bother to talk to their kids and figure out if their kids are depressed?
All that seems to matter here is the blame. Where does the BLAME end? This is all AFTER the bullying has occurred that we decide to get upset about it. I agree with everyone else that we need to focus on prevention, because no amount of BLAME or consequences is going to bring a girl back after she has killed herself. And yes, legislation can be used for prevention, but it can also be used TO bully. It can leave a lot of bodies in its wake. We need to focus on educating and loving our children so that they know they have somewhere to turn. Focus on the victim, not the alleged perpetrators.Like (2)
-
What about victims of bullying that have become murderers themselves???
Like (1)
-
the bad guys should face the music for their actions, but not for the bad choices their victim makes.
...
suicide is the victim's decision.
...
if i dump my girlfriend for no good reason, and she pulls the plug, should i go to jail?
if i get an F on my homework and kill myself, should the teacher go to jail?Like (1)
-
Yes
Like (1)
-
There's an epidemic of bullying in the workplace, including by bosses. Unless you are suggesting it's a case of do-as-we-say-and-not-as-we-do I don't see the point.
Like (1)
-
According to Juv Court system they are held responcible for any violent actions .
Like (1)
-
anyone for that matter
Like (1)
-
We should do both because some would just ignore the rules and have their way with others so yes, they should be made to face the consequences for their actions.
Like (1)
-
yes!
Like (1)
-
No, not if we are talking about bullies who are still children themselves! I speak as one who was severely bullied as a child and considered suicide often. Bullying is sad and it is wrong, but there is always more to the story than that last incident before the suicide.
Like (1)
-
Yes if it is proven then they should be charged with manslaughter
Like (1)
-
If they were held legally liable for the death of the victim, what degree of homicide would the perpetrator be charged with?
Like (1)
-
-
they knew what they were doing and i think it makes sense for them to face the law
Like (1)
-
Can you prove they knew what they were doing? Can you prove they knew that they were causing a person to SERIOUSLY consider suicide? And can you tell me who "they" are? Who do you consider the bully? Every single person who has ever said anything negative to the victim? Or just the people who say the most? How do you judge that?
Like (1)
-
can you prove that they didnt know what they were doing? Can you prove that they didnt know that they were causing a person to seriously consider suicide..and do you seriously dont know who 'they' are..there has never been a positive outcome of bullying, whether its mild or severe..whether in any form, its an abuse to the victim..
Like (1)
-
Yep. That should be something to motivate prevention. You will be held criminally liable for it. It's just like murder. Especially if the person bullied commits suicide.
Like (1)
-
What happens if the person bullied does NOT commit suicide? How far do we go in charging bullies? What if I was bullied and I did not hurt myself in any way? Do my bullies still get charged? How do you determine who the bullies are? No one's nice to me, no one likes me, everyone says something mean at SOME point - who's the bully? Is it just the people who do it most often? So the people who bully occasionally get off scott free?
Like (1)
-
YES they should but I also agree with Tamarite and focusing on prevention would be the better way to go.
Like (1)
-
I agree that prevention is the way to go. Bullying itself is far too difficult to regulate and I'm not sure it properly can be.
Like (1)
-
Yes, the individuals should be held accountable for their actions.
Like (1)
Best Answer (Chosen By Asker):
Posted by growwhereyouglow Oct 21st, 2012 at 1:02PM
I do believe they should be held responsible. Real actions, real consequences. That being said, they have developing minds at that age, so I would want them reviewed over a period of time during their sentence. Should they get a life sentence with eligibility for parole? That seems fair as you can monitor their rehabilitation. To get off easily, knowing they bullied a weaker person to death seems highly unfair and sends a continued message that, 'this is all that will happen to you'. It should be taken very seriously. However, by way of bullying if it resulted in a death, that is a very severe act. To set an example would send a message that this is serious and has serious consequences. However, since the weapon of choice is cruelty, it's so subjective and therefor would only result in involuntary manslaughter. Since most are underage, juvenile detention seems beyond 'soft' for that type of crime. It seems like with the information we have today, knowing full well what cruelty and bullying can do, it should be looked at as a weapon. Like a kid that picks up a handgun and shoots someone, it seems like bullying should indeed be looked at in the same way and the consequences should coincide with that.
[ Reply ] | Like (3)
Reply by growwhereyouglow Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:02PM
Like (1)
Reply by LovesLaborsLost Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:45PM
Like (1)