Post
Experience Project iOS Android Apps | Download EP for your Mobile Device
Here's the owners of Tesla? See a connection here? •Elon Musk: Obama donor, DNC donor. Tesla Motors Founder. Also CEO of Solar City which received its own $275 million in stimulus funding. Between Solar City and Tesla Motors, Musk personally pocketed $15 million immediately after receiving their stimulus. •Steve Westly: Tesla Motors CEO. Pocketed $1.2 million immediately after their stimulus payment. •Steve Spinner: Obama donor, DNC donor. Then appointed to an executive position within the Dept of Energy. •Nicholas Pritzker: Obama donor. Related to a number of Obama advisors and high-profile donors. •Sergei Brin: Obama supporter. •Larry Page: Google CEO. Obama supporter. •Eric Schmidt: Obama administration advisor. •Dan Reicher: Obama administration advisor.
TwylaMarie TwylaMarie 41-45, F 7 Answers Oct 9, 2012 in Community

Your Response

Cancel

No, I don't think they should have, what benefit have we gotten from that dubious transfusion of cash? None that I know of.

Best Answer

What are you an idiot or a Republican who acts like an idiot? Yes Tesla motors really should have gotten 466 million dollars - actually they should have gotten WAY more than this - like all of General motors - lets tell you WHY this is the case. <br />
<br />
First off Tesla paid back the loan way early. How? They used the money to produce a plant that churned out Tesla sedans that people bought. The only problem was it was on too small a scale. Tesla's share price has skyrocketed but imagine if instead of producing 20,000 cars - they could produce with GM 's assets 20 million cars. Cars at a low price, cars at a high price, SUV's, Trucks, - loads of electric cars. Who would by these cars - the whole world. <br />
<br />
First off they could be exported - no one has Tesla's battery know how. Their cars have far fewer parts - they are cheaper to build and they can be a LOT cheaper to build - higher profits, lower costs to consumers in purchase price AND in operating costs.<br />
<br />
These cars are GAME changers. <br />
<br />
On a macro economic view - they dramatically cut the demand for oil. Now in the US half the electricity is produced from coal which is dirty so the cars are not as "green" as you would first think but the point here is the cash stays at home rather than going off shore. This is very good for the US economy. <br />
<br />
So get off your high horse - there is a role for government to play in industry - and Tesla just proved it. The only problem that was done was that no one dreamed big enough fast enough - because the US could have well used those jobs - jobs that Tesla technologies could provide and now will provide - it is just that it will take a lot longer and allow others perhaps to compete with them. Look at it as a HUGE lost opportunity and one that government could have provided at the time as the US and Canadian governments actually owned GM for that point in time. <br />
<br />
Oh well.

Best Answer

Tesla and Solar City are not the only Musk owned recipients of this administration's generosity. Ever hear of SpaceX?

Best Answer

Actually one I like. but again, this is money that should have gone for job creation during a time of something of a crisis.

Best Answer

Me too, but regards stimulous we both know it was really never about jobs . It was about paying off supporters.

Best Answer

Personally I see potential for a lot of laundering of taxpayer money, I'd like to know how many of those "stimulus" dollars found their way back into the 0bama campaign fund?

Best Answer

How many jobs were saved or created?

Best Answer

Not many - it's less than 900 now - and wasn't much different then.

Best Answer

900 families are happy for the choice.

Best Answer

no - there were more than 800 working before the money. (Hard to get exact numbers. Private company.) Don't think there was anyplace better for a half billion to go? At least Hitlers car company made cars people could afford.

Best Answer

Not my call....

Best Answer

As a taxpayer, its should be. It's close to a half billion in taxpayer money. Not quite Solyndra, but questionable.

Best Answer

GLWT

Best Answer

That works out to about $820,000 per family. Kinda expensive.

Best Answer
4 More Responses

No reply unless in English.

Best Answer

What is not in english here? It's a question about whether a sports car company should have gotten a half billion dollars meant for job creation.

Best Answer