Should the 50% of Americans working to support the 50% of Americans not working go on strike?
10 Answers to "Should the 50% of Americans working to support the 50% of Americans not working go on strike?"
-
50% of Americans not working?! Wow! You must be including children in that number, and possibly some deceased.
Like (5)
-
They should have taken time off from work to vote for Romney. But since they were too busy working to support unemployed persons, who live off Obama's handouts, they didn't have time to vote. That is why Romney lost.
Like (3)
-
cmon mitt the election is over go home
Like (2)
-
yea do it I am not on wellfare at don't have a job so when you go on strike i will take your job like that chipmonk talked about
Like (2)
-
free housing it out the window because i am a drug felon and most of the other free stuff i can not get..as far as taking your job your company probley does not hire felons..Like (1)
-
I say we all quit our jobs and get our fair share of foodstamps and free birth control.
Like (1)
-
Perhaps the ones that are actually working just move to Asia to get the jobs we sent there.
Like (1)
-
Or we just ship more jobs over there.Like (1)
-
Do what I just did this morning. See tax man and get some creative book work done so that your money stays your money.
Like (1)
-
What? So now you think you know me?Like (1)
-
sounds good to me.
Like (1)
-
Yes, they should.
Like (1)
Best Answer (Chosen by Voting):
Posted by ChipmunkErnie Nov 7th, 2012 at 9:54PM
Yes, then the 50% not working can be scabs, take the strikers' jobs, and support their families while the strikers go on welfare. Besides, where the hell did you get that 50% figure?
[ Reply ] | Like (6)