Post
thedevilpeeks thedevilpeeks 26-30, M 18 Answers Jun 16 in Politics

Your Response

Cancel

God no, voting is like singing; no one should be encouraged to do it. If you don't have the self-motivation to get to the polls, I don't want your vote to count.

Best Answer

it wouldn't matter our elections are already huge shams

Best Answer

Yes.

Best Answer

That would poison the well of free choice.

Best Answer

No, we have enough uninformed voting now.

Best Answer

No, apathy has its own momentum...

Best Answer

As long as there is also a requirement for service in public office.

Best Answer

How would it be enforced? And what type of voting are you talking about?

Best Answer

Voting in State elections.

Best Answer

Yeah, I think State elections would be a more realistic goal.

Best Answer

no. but they should increase public knowledge of it. run commericals on tv, ask google to let a person know where in their area the booth is, perhaps even send a voter registration form to all houses

Best Answer

Unless you can vote online or via text message, it's not going to work.

Best Answer

you're supposed to be able to vote by mail but it doesn't always work (like after a natural disaster). you should be able to vote online, why don't you tell your congressman about that? they should also play patriotic songs

Best Answer

Online voting = sham election.

Best Answer

Washington State is full vote by mail already. My wife's late grandmother still gets a ballot every election. My MIL has informed the County Clerk's office several time, that she is dead, but they refuse to remove her from the voters rolls or to stop sending out the ballots to her. What happens if family moves out of that home? The new residents get her ballot, will they be honest and shred it or will they try to vote with it? Hopefully the former and not that latter.

Best Answer

if you know how to the voting goes, that doesn't actually make much difference but it is stupid

Best Answer
2 More Responses

Only if a 'none of the above' option is included.

Best Answer

A no confidence vote resulting in the parties to get their **** together.

Best Answer

No

Best Answer

Yep. In my opinion it would fix a lot of things. If that was the law early voting and (a free) voter ID would be the norm, as well as absentee ballots, extended hours, and more poll workers in the largest districts. If we have to wait more than 2 hours to vote. There's a BIG problem.

Best Answer

What about online and text voting. You can bank online, why not vote?

Best Answer

And the punishment for not voting should be what? People would not have to wait 2 hours if some citizens were a little responsible and registered to vote ahead of time.

Best Answer

Online and text voting would be asking for fraud, duh. Justshootme, why do you think i put early voting and extended hours in there? Secondly, we wouldn't have to register voters every election if certain red states would stop purging the rolls illegally (http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/appeals-court-rules-florida-voter-purge-violated-federal-law/2173054). We might be able to vote if certain red states stopped eliminating early voting (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/victory-voting-ohio) and punishing people for getting out of line to pee (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/victory-voting-ohio) We also wouldn't have to wait a long time if certain red states would stop closing polling stations in predominately minority or inner city areas (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/11/florida-polling-locations_n_4765982.html - From the Bradenton Herald ). And Finally no one would have an issue with voter ID if it was a free photo ID issued by the state. And If you didn't vote I'd say a $100 fine seems appropriate.

Best Answer

The poor cant afford a 5 dollar ID but 100 dollars every time they dont vote. Do you pre- read this stuff in your head before posting? I never mentioned online voting. There is enough voter fraud as it is.

Best Answer

The online voting response was directed at devil peeks who answered before you. Ignore that. Secondly, Why do you assume the poor are the ones who don't vote? Secondly, I had to pay 50 dollars for my photo ID, where the hell do you live that a id is five bucks?

Best Answer
2 More Responses

yep....

Best Answer

What are the added benefits?

Best Answer

rid of the Torries

Best Answer

why? the people dont decide who gets into power, the banks do

Best Answer

I'd rather people not vote if they have no information on who/what they're voting for.

Best Answer

Australia does it and it tends to reduce the extremes in candidates and parties.

Best Answer

What works for one country may not work for another.

Best Answer

Just like democracy works in Denmark, but not in the USA.

Best Answer

US isn't really a democracy.

Best Answer

It's a republic that plays with democracy to placate the peasants.

Best Answer
2 More Responses

No.

Best Answer

Why not?

Best Answer

Because then even more idiots would vote.

Best Answer

This is a republic. We have a republic because most people are idiots and the framers wanted to avoid a collapse. The same republic would allow for broader participation and hamper the extremes on either wing.

Best Answer

No, it wouldn't. People who want to vote, should go out and vote..the illiterate, the inept, the uninformed, hopefully stay far away. As you can see by the 2008 and 2012 election results, the uninformed, inept and illiterate voted more so than they had in earlier elections..and look how ****** we are.

Best Answer

The point is, most people don't vote. They don't vote because they have lives and have to work. Voting is an inconvenience. Just because you disagree with an individual's perspective does not mean they are inept or illiterate. Democrats had to win in 2008. It is not the fault of the Democrats that Romney was a horrible candidate.

Best Answer

They don't vote because they don't care who wins the election. Democrats didn't have to win in 2008, or 2012..and simply disagreeing is not the reason I call them inept and illiterate. I refuse to think someone with a brain functioning at normal levels, or someone who could read, would vote for a man who has, essentially, no political history..and what history he had managing, and his career as a lawyer, were both horrible failures..and a man who had an abysmal first term. Someone with a functioning brain would conclude this is a bad investment for the country. Someone who is literate would have read about his failures and this, not voted for him.

Best Answer

That isn't necessarily true. Of course Democrats had to win in 2008. Bush was a horrible president and people wanted something new. Obama is a very intelligent and accomplished man. He was not prepared for the presidency and that was the fault of the Democratic primary that selected him over seasoned candidates with connections in congress. Obama is a poor politician and that is clear from his domestic and foreign policy failures. You overestimate the intelligence of the average voter. People generally vote party line. They don't do their research because this is a two party state and as we saw with Obama, you cannot get anything done without your party to support you.

Best Answer

Bush went downhill in 2006, when Democrat shad both House and Senate. Surprising? Not. Obama is a horrific president, and not at ALL accomplished in any way, shape, or form. He was a community manager, he failed at it. He was a Senator, he failed to take a stand on anything, much less vote on anything of meaning. His foreign policy is worse than abysmal. His economic policies are horrific. His promises were, as expected, nothing but fluff meant to bribe unintelligent voters. He has increased the debt by a grotesque degree. He is petty. He is arrogant. He throws tantrums when he doesn't get his way. Need I continue?

Best Answer

The Bush Administration along with Congress instituted the Patriot Act, started a war in Iraq. Obama had more accomplishments than Bush before he became President, but neither of their presidencies could be declared a success.

Best Answer

Obama had no accomplishments before his presidency.

Best Answer

Whatever makes you happy Tranny.

Best Answer
8 More Responses

No

Best Answer

Why not?

Best Answer

like some of the Commie countries? Don't think so.

Best Answer

Like Australia.

Best Answer

Related Questions