Register

The Beatles or The Rolling Stones?

Is This A Good Question? (13)

Add an Answer to "The Beatles or The Rolling Stones?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

    Best Answer (Chosen By Asker):

    maestro1x - 31-35 years old - male

    Posted by maestro1x Jan 25th, 2012 at 3:32AM

    Beatles. They changed the way the 20th century sounded. But the Stones had and have more sex. Solution: Live like a Rolling Stone and listen to the Beatles from time to time...

    [ Reply ] | Like (2)

31 Answers to "The Beatles or The Rolling Stones?"

  1. dorianblue - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by dorianblue Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:25PM

    Stones. They aren't quitters. And they put a lot more soul into the sound.

    Like (6)

  2. waterlooSunset - 36-40 years old - male

    Reply by waterlooSunset Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:35PM

    :)

    Like (1)

  3. abstraction - male

    Reply by abstraction Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:36PM

    Quitters? A band isn't a religious order that people vow to stay in. They wanted to do something else.

    Like (1)

    1 more reply
  4. Abbeyrhode - 46-50 years old - female

    Posted by Abbeyrhode Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:24PM

    The Beatles, their talent is unmatched.

    Like (5)

  5. NigelDoes - 46-50 years old - male

    Reply by NigelDoes Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:24PM

    Agreed. :-)

    Like (1)

  6. waterlooSunset - 36-40 years old - male

    Reply by waterlooSunset Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:30PM

    Ok, so that explains your user name... ;)

    Like (1)

    1 more reply
  7. angelinafreckle - 36-40 years old - female

    Posted by angelinafreckle Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:24PM

    Stones ...............

    Like (3)

  8. fourthtot - 22-25 years old - female

    Posted by fourthtot Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:23PM

    Rolling Stonessss

    Like (3)

  9. SEANCURIOS - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by SEANCURIOS Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:21PM

    stones...TOTALLY

    Like (3)

  10. akindheart - 56-60 years old - female

    Posted by akindheart Mar 16th, 2012 at 10:54PM

    Mick and the boys...hands down..they are still going strong.

    Like (2)

  11. towhead2 - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by towhead2 Feb 1st, 2012 at 9:37AM

    In the end, for me it comes down to personal preference. I always preferred the Rolling Stones because of their rhythm and blues sound that came across much more professional than the garage rock sound of the Beatles. I love their ballad pieces like Lady Jane, Ruby Tuesday and Time is on my side.

    Like (2)

  12. singwme - 56-60 years old - female

    Posted by singwme Jan 25th, 2012 at 3:21PM

    Beatles all the way--still can't believe how young they were when they wrote all those brilliant songs. Practically babies!

    Like (2)

  13. singwme - 56-60 years old - female

    Reply by singwme Jan 25th, 2012 at 3:22PM

    by the way-I love the Stones, too

    Like (1)

  14. BamPow - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by BamPow Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:10AM

    I definitely listen to the Stones more often, but I'm not going to knock The Beatles.

    Like (2)

  15. Wazza59 - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by Wazza59 Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:05AM

    The Stones...Better music.

    Like (2)

  16. whowasthatmaskedman - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by whowasthatmaskedman Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:38PM

    Beatles and early stones were different, but on a par. But for pure musical evolution and creative talent it has to be the Beatles.

    Like (2)

  17. pixelbest - 46-50 years old - female

    Posted by pixelbest Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:31PM

    Both the sound track of my childhood. Oh the Stones, mainly for how long they have been going.

    Like (2)

  18. NedKelly1 - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by NedKelly1 Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:29PM

    AC/DC

    Like (2)

  19. waterlooSunset - 36-40 years old - male

    Reply by waterlooSunset Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:31PM

    Really??????? ;)

    Like (1)

  20. Bear1956 - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by Bear1956 Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:22PM

    The Beatles, no question about it!

    Like (2)

  21. EdieQuinnz - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by EdieQuinnz Jan 24th, 2012 at 6:21PM

    The Stones

    Like (2)

  22. OHGOONTHEN - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by OHGOONTHEN Mar 16th, 2012 at 7:00AM

    I like both I have seen the Rolling stones ,and seen various Beatles tribute acts the best was the mersey Beatles ,

    Like (1)

  23. MrsJoanieBNH - 56-60 years old

    Posted by MrsJoanieBNH Jan 25th, 2012 at 6:54PM

    Can I like them both? Only can Mick Jagger please call it quits. he's ruining all of his great songs.. Same with Steven Tyler! His rendition of the National Anthem to open the Pats Ravin's game was that side of awful that happens when your an old rock star, everyone loves you, now just go away.

    Like (1)

  24. Ambivilent - 56-60 years old - male

    Posted by Ambivilent Jan 25th, 2012 at 6:36PM

    both

    Like (1)

  25. amington - 51-55 years old

    Posted by amington Jan 25th, 2012 at 3:34PM

    BEATLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "The Beatles or The Rolling Stones?"