US law states that a person must be born in the US in order to be president? Why should this law remain or change?
Related Questions to US law states that a person must be born in the US in order to be president? Why should this law remain or change?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "US law states that a person must be born in the US in order to be president? Why should this law remain or change?"
8 Answers to "US law states that a person must be born in the US in order to be president? Why should this law remain or change?"
Posted by ChakatBlackstar Apr 14th, 2011 at 2:31PM
I think it should change since a person's country of origin has nothing to do with their competency as a political leader.
Like (2)
Posted by Ketsan Apr 14th, 2011 at 1:54PM
It should be changed so that you can live under my beneficent rule.
Like (2)
Posted by softconnection Dec 10th, 2011 at 4:32PM
Its hard to answer question to answer. The way things is going now; do it really matter. I dont think so.
Like (1)
Posted by automatrix Jul 7th, 2011 at 12:21PM
Is this another stupid anti-Obama question? The ******* who bitched "Respect the presidency!" when Bush was there are the same morons disrespecting the presidency now. How unsurprising.
As for foreigners leading another country, are you talking about Arnold Schwarzenegger? He's been proven more fiscally incompetent than Bush. Why would you want him?
Speaking of Austrians, Adolf Hitler was Austrian, not German.
Like (1)
Posted by OrionsSword Apr 15th, 2011 at 3:08AM
regardless of what you think, since it would take an amendment to the constitution, and as how hard they are to peddle these days, it will never change, so the birthers need to find something else to be disappointed with.
Like (1)
Posted by Brainyblonde Apr 14th, 2011 at 4:55PM
Actually, it's in the US Constitution.
The argument for it staying the same is that we would want a president who shares American cultural values and has had an experience in his life of growing up American so he can better understand what kind of leadership Americans would need and want.
The argument for changing the US Constitution would be that there is no more American culture anymore due to huge amounts of illegal, NWO sponsored, immigration so we might as well cave in and change the US Constitution. Furthermore, the Constitution is dying anyway because the Patriot Act killed it and most kids growing up in America today know lnothing about the Constitution or the Bill of RIghts.....the American dream has died. So why not just change everything?
Like (1)
Posted by BiCuriousSubmissive Apr 14th, 2011 at 2:34PM
It can't change. Foreigners cannot be President. Mexico is not America. It would destroy national identity. American pride is racist? I thought America was a diverse society. This further rewards illegals and make immigration law a joke. We cannot survive being a nation of lawlessness. We cannot survive without immigrants and social groups assimilating for unity of American society. You cannot embrace diversity, difference, and equality, sameness, at the same time. They are counter intuitive. We cannot survive as nation with factions. Gay americans, lesbian americans, african americans, eurpoean americans, hisanic americans, asian americans, etc . . .
Like (1)
Posted by Aether71 Apr 14th, 2011 at 1:53PM
This is not an altogether true question, the Constitution of the US states that they President must be a Natural Born Citizen, which could mean that they were born in another country as John McCain was, but their citizenship was legal because of other circumstances, namely he was born on a Military base to two American Citizens.
Like (1)
Reply by SallySea Apr 14th, 2011 at 4:26PM
Should it change?
Like (1)