One of life's great unanswerable questions.
I think only your 24 year old kid could answer that--I happen to have a friend who gave birth at 17. He's 44 and still lives with her. She got pregnant after Doctor Zchivago which I think is stupid, but so romantic indeed. Why women should always have condoms. A woman without a condom is the epitome of irresponsibility. I've met a hundred women who wouldn't carry a condom but they all had a tampon. You don't expect him to have your tampon--why should he have your condom? It's your future, your life, your choice. If you can't even bother with that--do the kid a favor and not give birth cause it ain't like you're gonna get smarter.
It depends on if there's a baby 'in there' or not
Hmmm I have to say it depends on the girl and the situation some people have a very successful life after giving birth at 17 others are a trainwreck. Sometimes people get AIDS or diseases that leave them infertile so it would have been better giving birth at 17.
Hey. I have never flamed anyone other than Nazis on this site before, but here goes. <br />
How about knocking off the one-off questions? <br />
They are foolish and thoroughly unimaginative. They make you look like an @sshole.
Now a goatse @sshole.
Depends. But between my family and friends, giving birth ANYTIME before the age of 20 is not a good sign generally...
Well my mom had me at 17 so I will go with giving birth...otherwise I would not be here to write this incredibly good answer on EP
it depends on if your only opportunity to give birth was at 17