Post
Experience Project iOS Android Apps | Download EP for your Mobile Device
fourthtot fourthtot 22-25, F 13 Answers Apr 22, 2012

Your Response

Cancel

One of life's great unanswerable questions.

Best Answer

I think only your 24 year old kid could answer that--I happen to have a friend who gave birth at 17. He's 44 and still lives with her. She got pregnant after Doctor Zchivago which I think is stupid, but so romantic indeed. Why women should always have condoms. A woman without a condom is the epitome of irresponsibility. I've met a hundred women who wouldn't carry a condom but they all had a tampon. You don't expect him to have your tampon--why should he have your condom? It's your future, your life, your choice. If you can't even bother with that--do the kid a favor and not give birth cause it ain't like you're gonna get smarter.

Best Answer

It depends on if there's a baby 'in there' or not

Best Answer

Hmmm I have to say it depends on the girl and the situation some people have a very successful life after giving birth at 17 others are a trainwreck. Sometimes people get AIDS or diseases that leave them infertile so it would have been better giving birth at 17.

Best Answer

Hey. I have never flamed anyone other than Nazis on this site before, but here goes. <br />
<br />
How about knocking off the one-off questions? <br />
<br />
They are foolish and thoroughly unimaginative. They make you look like an @sshole.

Best Answer

wah wah wah

Best Answer

Now a goatse @sshole.

Best Answer

Depends. But between my family and friends, giving birth ANYTIME before the age of 20 is not a good sign generally...

Best Answer

Well my mom had me at 17 so I will go with giving birth...otherwise I would not be here to write this incredibly good answer on EP

Best Answer

it depends on if your only opportunity to give birth was at 17

Best Answer

Related Questions