Whats worse, having weak morals, no morals or bad morals?
Related Questions to Whats worse, having weak morals, no morals or bad morals?
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "Whats worse, having weak morals, no morals or bad morals?"
12 Answers to "Whats worse, having weak morals, no morals or bad morals?"
Posted by Babydoll42 Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:26PM
so....who decides which are good and which are bad, or weak? isn't it a matter of perception???
Like (2)
Posted by ForEsme Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:26PM
Morality is relative, subject to the society one lives in. I just try to live a good, harmless life.
Like (2)
Posted by srslydoomed Mar 22nd, 2012 at 4:37PM
moral, in modern common usage:- adjective 1. of or concerned with right conduct 2. virtuous - noun 3. principles of conduct 4. moral lesson
some people may have been brought up by people with little concern of right and wrong, thus diminishing the natural sense of it. I have known these people. they are on their own path towards enlightenment.
some people, in a mental state of survivalism or greed, lose touch with the sense of right and wrong.
some people have had non-traditional lessons with uncommon morals. they are also on their own path.
the world is complicated, as are we. in this world, in our minds, and in our hearts, right and wrong are frequently neither black or white, nor the same between us. that said, I find the completely moralless to be frightening and do my best to avoid startling them or bringing their attention to me.
Like (1)
Posted by rockingentleman Mar 17th, 2012 at 3:24PM
The creation of the word moral itself is a disturbance to this world in a whole.
Like (1)
Posted by atadir Mar 17th, 2012 at 2:49PM
depends: my morals or your morals?
Like (1)
Posted by Adonis01 Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:53PM
I think just like a person before it depends on the morals of a society. The societal moral I follow allow homosexuality to exists as a natural things as to where Christian or Islamic morals dictate other wise. They would say it is bad and I would say it is good. So therefore it depends on perspective since a lot of cultures clash in opinion.
Like (1)
Posted by satan19872000 Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:43PM
bad morals make the man very weak and selfish and in the end he will find him self alone no one likes bad people even the bad ones,,, weak morals make the man an hypocrite...... finally to have good morals is very hard, and to keep them is harder, and to live with them is a big challange..... it's not easy to be a good person but it deserve to try it.....GOOD LUCK
Like (1)
Posted by silkgirl8 Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:35PM
No morals is no good at all.
Like (1)
Posted by Vessa Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:33PM
No morals, if it is possible. It means you are capable of doing anything without remorse. The lack of morality indicates a lack of emotion or connection. I'm not sure that amoral people actually exist. Everyone with a thinking brain makes certain judgments and decisions according to a certain meter of right or wrong....even if it is only right or wrong as it regards himself.
Bad morals would be next. The fact that the person has a conscience, even if it's not in the typical sense, still means the person will make better judgments than the person who has none.
Like (1)
Posted by MaleInTights Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:30PM
Yep bad morals... then weak....
Like (1)
Posted by BILL1751 Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:28PM
peoples morals change with the times
Like (1)
Posted by BuckarooBonzai Mar 17th, 2012 at 1:26PM
Bad morals
Like (1)