Register

What's worse... not having anything to lose or everything to lose?

Q&A Home   >  Lifestyle and Style   >  Causes
Ask Question

Asked By: MorningBreeze 56-60, F  1 year ago

Is This A Good Question? (4)

Add an Answer to "What's worse... not having anything to lose or everything to lose?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

3 Answers to "What's worse... not having anything to lose or everything to lose?"

  1. 2011A - 51-55 years old - female

    Posted by 2011A Mar 25th, 2012 at 1:46PM

    Having everything to lose. I have been there and that is far worse.

    Like (2)

  2. MorningBreeze - 56-60 years old - female

    Reply by MorningBreeze Mar 25th, 2012 at 1:51PM

    i bet!

    Like (1)

  3. Whateverrrrr - 36-40 years old - female

    Posted by Whateverrrrr Mar 25th, 2012 at 1:34PM

    When you have lost everything or almost, there's nothing else to lose.

    Like (2)

  4. MorningBreeze - 56-60 years old - female

    Reply by MorningBreeze Mar 25th, 2012 at 1:53PM

    so no fear! right?

    Like (1)

  5. Whateverrrrr - 36-40 years old - female

    Reply by Whateverrrrr Mar 25th, 2012 at 2:36PM

    Right, no fear.

    Like (1)

  6. djc176 - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by djc176 Mar 10th, 2013 at 1:14PM

    Everything to lose, cause your options are now limited, too much is at stake. Nothing to lose can be quite liberating.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Related Questions to What's worse... not having anything to lose or everything to lose?

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "What's worse... not having anything to lose or everything to lose?"