Depends on age, Kim Kardasian and I dont care for the Kardasian family drama
No one that I know of. I know I don't go crazy over anyone.
The question is offensive but still - lets try putting the "special" person striaght - as if they have "ears to hear" and "eyes to see"<br />
In short - listen and learn - in this case read text on the awful site called Experience Project (and learn how to edit Shyte out of your input stream)<br />
Dont take my word but do some serious reading and find out yourself - <br />
a) "female sexuality" is constructed almost purely - it is called social construction - stupid phrase isnt it?<br />
It means that girls read fairytales and create an idea of a romantic ob<x>ject in mind - to compare future men with - the man is of course nothing like any real man ever - so all real men can be unfavourably compared and the women can (just coincidence!) feel SUPERIOR to all men.<br />
b) "male sexuality" is NOT constructed or ba<x>sed upon social condition, suggestion, marketing, film, media, or self hypnosis.<br />
"Male sexuality" is therefore real and can be called from now on just sexuality without quotation marks.<br />
It is dependent on raised levels of testosterone in the body and the influence of this on the brain at all the key stages of growth and the resultant effect on behaviour and positive feedback on the brain.<br />
Any genetic element is likely to be related to the effect on testosterone levels and oestrogen levels in the body and the ability of the brain and body part to interact with the hormone. <br />
Gay men still have testosterone mediated sexual impulse or libido.<br />
As do women - the few women with high levels of testosterone are at least as much more gay as straight.<br />
Hence men do not have fairtales and in the modern day they dont have effective analogues - evil marketing people telling men who they should want - they instead have evil marketing telling people the type they want<br />
In fact men of previous generations - before what we call "Pornvertising" of the last decade at least - just liked all women and could find many women attractive simply because THEY HAVE SEXUALITY FFS.<br />
Womens so called desire is manipulated so easy because they have no sexuality - they are more suggestible too in all ways hence why almost all marketing is directed at women and yes in a homoerotic way.<br />
Just coincidence that many of the "men" women are told (basically ordered) to worship - look like women - sort of allowable homoerotic attraction - "its ok technically it's a man" or in this case a child.<br />
Sorry did you want to know or were you just being dumb?<br />
I suggest you look up the references on this and seriously consider the harm done to society once you understand it.
Rihanna or Lady Gaga they are both young and current.
From what I can tell, Megan Fox, or just about anybody with Boobs.
No certain person. Especially not a celebrity. I don't like how fake they are. But for me, it's any girl that is pure natural beauty.
Used to be Jessica Alba, but now I have no clue. I've been out of touch with the pulse of mainstream icons for a long time. I will say one thing, Mary Elizabeth Winstead gets me going.
Guys don't do it in exactly the same way but Mila Kunis brings most of my guy friends to thier knees. lol
Eeeh. She's alright. Not very amazing... mildly alright. %_%
OMFG!! Selfconcept sublimation into social proof and group behavior protocol for celebrity worship!!!
No one. They score really big in the Man vs Women war for that one. So, quit it, girls.
Taylor Swift!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xD