Register

Who is more valuable to the Angels: Pujols or Trout?

Q&A Home   >  Hobbies   >  Sports
Ask Question

Asked By: billblake 51-55, M  2 months ago

I go with Trout.

Is This A Good Question? (1)

Add an Answer to "Who is more valuable to the Angels: Pujols or Trout?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

    Best Answer (Chosen by Voting):

    SimonLaStrange - 41-45 years old - male

    Posted by SimonLaStrange Mar 11th, 2013 at 3:54PM

    pooholes angels need pooholes

    [ Reply ] | Like (1)

3 Answers to "Who is more valuable to the Angels: Pujols or Trout?"

  1. littleone7733 - 41-45 years old

    Posted by littleone7733 Mar 11th, 2013 at 3:55PM

    If you go with bang for the buck, it's no contest...

    Trout will provide so much for so little.

    Albert is very good no doubt, but his contract will be painful over the back half of it for the Halos.

    Like (1)

  2. kbgloves1 - 61-65 years old - male

    Posted by kbgloves1 Mar 11th, 2013 at 3:54PM

    Trout...boy are you on a fishing trip ;)

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Related Questions to Who is more valuable to the Angels: Pujols or Trout?

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Who is more valuable to the Angels: Pujols or Trout?"