(raises hand) I find it exponentially better. It's kind of like the difference between fast food (which has its merits) and a really satisfying, home-cooked meal.
It always will be better doing it with someone you don't love is just sex
That was a sarcastic no.
Are you for "REAL"? Number one, if it's someone you don't 'love', your not 'making love', your just f--king - no more & no less then some dog in heat that will f--k anything that comes along. While I can not speak for you, nor will I try, speaking for just myself, if I have interest in you ( no feelings ) , why would I even want to f--k you? Once again , while I make no atempt to speak for you, I think of myself as much more intelligent than a "DOG". That's why it is refered to as 'making love', it implies that their are 'feelings' there. Pretty simple to understand really.
This is so true. Love is passion. Otherwise it is just instinctive animal behavior and animal nature.
Love x 10
Why would someone want to make love when they don't love?
And all the people who say no will be EP's official Wh*re mascots.
an ******* lol love has nothing to do with it ask tina turner
i think so - i generally find that women who are in love with me are much more sexually responsive anyway - but casual sex has its own allure
depends on who does it the best
No because then I have to turn over the bal ls.
Beggars can't be choosey. I'll take either.
I've always been in d first category. hah<br />
I put my heartsoul&passion into it<br />
so u know the answer hun..
It IS better,if you just hsve sex to have sex then youre a **** or manwhore,& will never have someone to truly love you