Post
scarless21 scarless21 22-25, F 20 Answers Jul 28, 2012

Your Response

Cancel

At the thought of these two, I just threw up a little bit in my mouth.

Best Answer

I prefer a real lady and to me none of these two even come close to being a lady

Best Answer

Neither. I think celebrities are too superficial.

Best Answer

Ew...Even if I were male, I would rot away than have those two. I mean, I'm rather indifferent over them, but when brought to my plate, they'd go to my chien or turtle...

Best Answer

Vain women just bore the crap out of me. Give me Sandra Bullock.

Best Answer

to young for me ,, and i like real people not fake

Best Answer

Pepé Le Pew ...

Best Answer

Rihanna, at a push, no camera and script to follow.

Best Answer

I would pass on both. They both have been passed around more than a bong at a frat house. A joint at a Phish concert. A 40oz of Old English on a corner in New York in the late 80's. Passed around more than the mash potato bowl at Thanksgiving. That should be enough.

Best Answer

rhi rhi shes a freak

Best Answer

can i say nicki manaj or chloe instead?

Best Answer

Rihanna... She's hot... And at least has half a brain and some talent. What is Kim Kardasian good for besides getting laid?

Best Answer

kim kardashian,because she is fun size,

Best Answer

Rihanna, especially when she looks this hot!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_W_xLWtNa0

Best Answer

Pass... alone is looking much better

Best Answer

Neither. I find them both highly annoying.

Best Answer

Related Questions