Register

Why are male-owned harems more socially acceptable than female-owned harems?

Is This A Good Question? (4)

Add an Answer to "Why are male-owned harems more socially acceptable than female-owned harems?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

6 Answers to "Why are male-owned harems more socially acceptable than female-owned harems?"

  1. ChipmunkErnie - 61-65 years old - male

    Posted by ChipmunkErnie Oct 7th, 2010 at 9:44PM

    Because god declared women should be submissive to men? And don't yell at me -- I'm an atheist and had nothing to do with writing anyone's holy books.

    The word of Jesus doesn't apply to people who have other beliefs. Didn't Solomon (among others in the Hebrew Testament) have multiple wives and concubines. And Mohamed I think limited wives to four. The Mormons in Utah basically turned away from traditional polygamy in order to gain admittance to the US as a state. Etc., etc.

    Like (2)

  2. JustBernieGirl - 31-35 years old - female

    Reply by JustBernieGirl Oct 7th, 2010 at 11:48AM

    I would NEVER yell at a chipmunk. But Jesus said that each man should have only one women, and yet plenty of guys have more than one women. So if men can break the rules, how come women can't. Especially if half the people now don't even believe in God!

    Like (1)

  3. Lucinnda - 51-55 years old - female

    Posted by Lucinnda Oct 7th, 2010 at 9:33PM

    mkay - i'll bite.
    the original premise of the female harem (long socially acceptable in certain prechristian and nonchristian cultures as well as a couple of christian cults) was ostensibly so that the guy could have lots of kids/heirs. a female with a male harem doesn't yield that result, so there's no pragmatic rationale for it.

    women certainly "can" break the rules as much as men do - except men are congratulated for it and women are ridiculed for it. why? i dunno - people are stupid.

    Like (2)

  4. HeartofHearts - 31-35 years old

    Posted by HeartofHearts Oct 7th, 2010 at 4:27PM

    i think that if you have enough money, you could probably have a male harem. do you think that it has anything to do with male dominance and being filthy rich? i suppose that it's acceptable in certain cultures, but not in others. it also depends on the group of people that you run with socially...

    Like (2)

  5. humanidee - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by humanidee Jan 11th, 2012 at 8:10AM

    Where do I sign up? This could end the overpopulation problem. Someone should create a bogus religious cult based on this very concept.

    Like (1)

  6. JustBernieGirl - 31-35 years old - female

    Reply by JustBernieGirl Jan 11th, 2012 at 8:16AM

    Now there's an idea :P

    Like (1)

  7. wishingwanda - 46-50 years old

    Posted by wishingwanda Oct 12th, 2010 at 10:16AM

    an all male harem?
    i hope every guy is in a skirt
    then i would be there with bells on

    Like (1)

  8. myephaunts - 70+ years old

    Posted by myephaunts Oct 7th, 2010 at 11:34AM

    I did not know such harems existed-but would not want to join in-to each their own though is what I say.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Why are male-owned harems more socially acceptable than female-owned harems?"