Why do atheists invent imaginary dialogue when trying to "prove" a point?
2 Answers to "Why do atheists invent imaginary dialogue when trying to "prove" a point?"
-
I'm a journalist, formerly from Iran. How people deal with other people's beliefs is a topic I've worked on and discussed for many years.
The atheists I have met seem to be of roughly two sorts: the first is those who can enter a good, reasonable debate, based upon their beliefs that there is no God or that organised religion is fundamentally counterproductive. They make thinking and discussion a pleasure. Then there are those militant sorts who believe that atheism means attacking and mocking other people's convictions with smug intellectualism and self-aggrandisement (like Mr Dawkins).
I believe in God, but not in blind adherence to ancient books and laws. I know I can't prove the existence of God and that an atheist cannot disprove it. Therefore, to feel something is true without conclusive proof, we must both have faith.
We will all progress and live in harmony when we can discuss each others thoughts with dignity and leave them in dignity whether we agree with them or not. Take it from someone who has really suffered for it.Like (1)
Best Answer (Chosen by Voting):
Posted by Rennn Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:29AM
Am I the only one very amused that a religious person is berating the atheists for allegedly relying on imaginary points?
[ Reply ] | Like (4)