Why doesn't the extremely wealthy people help out people in poverty countries?

wealth is to competitive obsession what psychotic is to leadership and similar over achievements spurred by a drive for wealth a person with more rounded interests can't have for the stuff.
A psychotic who knows it's a trait can manage the badness while freeing the rest to advantage and make decisions affecting others with learned care but the detachment that allows them to sleep when others with empathy toss and turn with the morality of their choice
The wealthy feel their superior nature has allowed them to win evidenced by their account "Score" and you don't give away your winning score points to inferiors you've beaten who are stupid and beneath you as your wealth shows
Cash is a cold comfort with nothing to give and value only in belief that this paper is somehow real but monopoly paper is play
Just a belief and no more real than a game.... all dollars could disappear and the Earth would continue reality without a indication of our raindeer game has ended
Politics, religion, law.... games we act like are important
The tokins used as currency should expire every decade or so to reset the hording and similar from these types give 'em a meddle to show their win and that's it new game guys
And poverty is the condition that allows something like the u.s. excess of lifestyle that the world can not have.
We've kept Mexico down with invasion and revolution since the mid 1800's for just such a reason Canada escaping such as commonwealth member of our financial masters as evidenced by the treaty of Paris that don't look like the terms of a winner followed by 1812 and the civil payback for our uncivil invasion of Canada where our destruction included civilian structures and looting resulting in a little lesson in such disregards of the rules of war with the burning of the White House before the modern concept of murdering civilians as "total war" with the term war implying murder of the unarmed is somehow a part of the war tradition that never allowed murder or rape of civilians as a soldiers job but rather as crimes but while we attribute our production advantages to leaders like patton who lost more men in the bulge than douglas I'm a god and orders are beneath me mactrafder lost establishing beach heads (horrible casuality task) durring the whole war and Lee was a great commander but not for America.... and everything else was cruddy tanks that killed more crew with the fires after being hit than shells but exceeded enemy rounds in number or 11 bullet stopper infantry Government Issue (GI) speak for the tactics of there's more of us than them so march straight at them instead of preserving lives or other indications of command we ignore due to numbers and production
Any general who goes rogue like that... I'd of had him killed for it as that military coup step one and can not be allowed
His bonus army attack on the occupy movement of the day was also a bad note on a good career but lost my respect for the pompous big head b

countries do help each other but people on the street !! maybe if ever. The people with $$$$ live with eyes open shut and dont even get to see how the other hald live.

i certainly do ... last night i transferred a billion to Kenya and the day before i donated my party expense of a million to Somalia and ok ... let me remember ...oh yes, last Wednesday i dumped a few thousands in Nigeria as well .... But ok ... those were all like business ventures that WHO, UNICEF and the United Nations carry out as a part of their financial invasion program in poverty driven countries

They do. They purchase as much property and as many people as they can afford to control.

Goes against their morals and principals

selfishness!

*don't

*impoverished

They do.