Try not to be swayed by passionate opinions on circumstantial evidence.<br />
I'd have a much easier time believing in sea serpents as classically described - with sightings and stories going back some 3000 years, than the plesiosaur like desc<x>ription, with sightings going back, precisely to the surgeon's photograph of nessie (which was a hoax).
Because they knew that they had ruled on earth for centuries and most powerful animal of this planet is still to come in form of humans (homosepians) .
They are extinct.
Isn't that what people suspect, Nessie to be?