Register

Why is stem cell research so looked down upon if it is proven to be effective on certain illnesses?

Is This A Good Question? (18)

Add an Answer to "Why is stem cell research so looked down upon if it is proven to be effective on certain illnesses?"

Send me an email when there are new answers to this question

22 Answers to "Why is stem cell research so looked down upon if it is proven to be effective on certain illnesses?"

  1. dejaentendu90 - 22-25 years old - female

    Posted by dejaentendu90 May 18th, 2012 at 8:44AM

    Because many people think potential life is more important than living people.

    Like (9)

  2. mulder - 26-30 years old

    Reply by mulder May 18th, 2012 at 8:45AM

    could not have said it better myself.

    Like (1)

  3. DrewBerry - 46-50 years old - female

    Reply by DrewBerry May 18th, 2012 at 8:49AM

    ~ DITTO THAT ~

    Like (1)

    3 more replies
  4. Kathryn1985 - 26-30 years old - female

    Posted by Kathryn1985 May 18th, 2012 at 9:24AM

    Screwball religious reasons by fanatical, frothing conservo-quacks.

    Like (7)

  5. a2fun1 - 36-40 years old - male

    Reply by a2fun1 May 21st, 2012 at 2:15PM

    Unfortunately, they're not solely ultra-conservative religious zealots. Too many "Average Joes" who don't believe in science, revel in their ignorance in watching FauxNews daily. They aren't crazy, just completely misguided. *SIGH*

    Like (1)

  6. Lilt - 46-50 years old

    Posted by Lilt May 18th, 2012 at 9:20AM

    Fear and ignorance, of course.~~~ They are making amazing strides treating MS with stem cell therapy. And no dead babies are involved. They actually take the stem cells from the patients own bone marrow. They clean it up, destroying the existing immune cells, then inject the cells back into the patient. They are reversing the disability! Real scary stuff, eh?

    Like (5)

  7. ChipmunkErnie - 61-65 years old - male

    Reply by ChipmunkErnie May 18th, 2012 at 9:26AM

    I believe there is also hope that stems cells might be used to combat and possibly eventually reverse paralyzing spinal injuries. And I think stem cells can also be gotten from placental cells after the birth of a baby.

    Like (1)

  8. Lilt - 46-50 years old

    Reply by Lilt May 18th, 2012 at 9:35AM

    Spinal cord injuries, Alzheimer's, the list goes on and on.

    Like (1)

    2 more replies
  9. DrewBerry - 46-50 years old - female

    Posted by DrewBerry May 18th, 2012 at 8:47AM

    Most are not opposed to Stem Cell Research in general, but in the beginning, the research was strongly rooted in cells from Aborted Fetuses.
    There have been great strides made in the field. The harvest the cells mostly now from Umbilical Cords ~ called CORD Cell Research.
    But mostly is was a bunch of consevative republican banter designed to decrease personal healthcare choices...

    Like (5)

  10. eyes - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by eyes May 18th, 2012 at 11:21AM

    Ignorance.

    Stem cells can be obtained from umbilical cords - but because some people seem to think people will have abortions to get stem cells, they want to ban all research.

    They are so worried about policing someone else's morals that they ignore the greater good.

    Like (4)

  11. conceptualclarity - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by conceptualclarity Jun 3rd, 2012 at 5:51AM

    Nobody opposes non-embryonic stem cell research.

    Like (1)

  12. eyes - 31-35 years old - female

    Reply by eyes Jun 3rd, 2012 at 10:23PM

    yes, there are people who do. They think that is you allow that, then peo0ple will obtain them other ways and claim they are non-embryonic. It isn't necessarily a huge part of the population, but i know quite a few people who think that way - and yes. some of them are in policy making (or policy influencing) positions.

    Like (1)

  13. conceptualclarity - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by conceptualclarity May 19th, 2012 at 4:24AM

    NOBODY has been cure of anything by embryonic stem cells. Many people have been cured of serious conditions by adult stem cells from their own bodies.

    Embryonic stem cells have an inherent liability--immune system rejection, because they come from a different human. In addition they have been found to cause lots of tumors in mice. (Who needs tumors when you're already coping with a severe heath condition?)

    The reason that the Democrats didn't make as much noise about embryonic stem cells in 2008 as they did in 2004 was because the scientific consensus had strongly embraced the superiority of adult stem cells. That same consensus continues to this day, and people here are showing their ignorance in their answers.

    Like (3)

  14. ChipmunkErnie - 61-65 years old - male

    Reply by ChipmunkErnie May 19th, 2012 at 9:06AM

    Unfortunately adult stem cells are only multipotent and limited in use because they are matured, as opposed to the totipotent and pluripotent stems cells that would be ideal for research and much more widely useful.

    Like (1)

  15. conceptualclarity - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by conceptualclarity May 26th, 2012 at 2:25AM

    Your information is out of date, Ernie. The adult stem cells are now the greatest hope of the scientific community.

    Like (1)

    1 more reply
  16. facemanct - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by facemanct May 18th, 2012 at 10:21AM

    It depends what type of stem cell research you are talking about, If they take stem cells from me and you they are very effective for many things and we are not harmed. But so far stem cells form aborted babies have shown no effectiveness for helping anything, in fact they have done the opposite lead to harm. Also there is the moral argument as well, Do you kill human life to use it for your own gain?

    Like (3)

  17. sierra33 - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by sierra33 May 18th, 2012 at 9:48AM

    People using archaic religious beliefs as a weapon against, present and future benefits... :(

    Like (3)

  18. jatpack3 - 36-40 years old - male

    Posted by jatpack3 May 18th, 2012 at 9:02AM

    It has a lot going against it.....fetal stem cells seem kinda morbid to me....how many dead babies would you want to cure a illness? Adult and cord blood cells sound ok to me but then there is the whole cloning issue involved. People will always fear the unknown....it scares them.

    Like (3)

  19. shannonymous - 18-21 years old - female

    Posted by shannonymous May 20th, 2012 at 9:47PM

    because god made it that way.

    Like (2)

  20. DenteAvvelenato - 31-35 years old - female

    Posted by DenteAvvelenato May 18th, 2012 at 9:52AM

    I blame Mary Shelley ....

    Its all Frankensteins fault!

    Like (2)

  21. CrazyWaterSpring - 51-55 years old - male

    Posted by CrazyWaterSpring May 18th, 2012 at 9:00AM

    Once it leads to common treatments attitudes among the public will change. Conservatives fear science until they need it.

    They care more about fetuses than babies.

    Like (2)

  22. jatpack3 - male

    Reply by jatpack3 May 18th, 2012 at 3:57PM

    Can I sacrifice your first born for some treatment?

    Like (1)

  23. telestrat - 46-50 years old - male

    Reply by telestrat May 20th, 2012 at 3:25PM

    and the world is flat, and the universe revolves around earth

    Like (1)

    1 more reply
  24. LilAnnie - 56-60 years old - female

    Posted by LilAnnie May 18th, 2012 at 8:55AM

    I know some people are afraid of the slippery slope. If the research proves effective, and it will, and profitable, and it will, the temptation will be there to manufacture human body parts, to have bio factories and such things. Inter species clones, bio blobs, and who am I kidding, its happening now. I have to admit, the notion creeps me out no end.

    Read Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood

    Like (2)

  25. B3lla01 - 46-50 years old - female

    Posted by B3lla01 May 18th, 2012 at 8:48AM

    "embryonic" stem cells are the issue and it is because of the never-ending dispute about the origin of human life.

    Like (2)

  26. Timb1 - 22-25 years old - male

    Posted by Timb1 May 18th, 2012 at 8:47AM

    Why does the sun come up? Or are the stars just pin holes in the curtain of night, who knows? What I do know men fear what they dont understand.

    Like (2)

  27. ShadowMonster - 22-25 years old - female

    Posted by ShadowMonster May 18th, 2012 at 8:45AM

    I don't think it's quite as controversial as it used to be because it really is enormously effective and the embryos used aren't even going to develop into people anyway. They're not babies, but rather women's eggs. I think the science is behind it and the only ones opposing it are just nuts and opposed to basically everything that has anything to do with science.

    Like (2)

  28. CrazyWaterSpring - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by CrazyWaterSpring May 18th, 2012 at 8:58AM

    Science and conservatism are always in conflict.

    Like (1)

  29. ShadowMonster - 22-25 years old - female

    Reply by ShadowMonster May 18th, 2012 at 9:00AM

    Yeah, but they don't HAVE to be. It's nuts.

    Like (1)

  30. CopperCoil - 36-40 years old - male

    Posted by CopperCoil Jun 3rd, 2012 at 6:27PM

    cause some people don't like to make fetus health shakes with the blender of science.

    Like (1)

  31. strayfarer - 46-50 years old - male

    Posted by strayfarer May 25th, 2012 at 5:30PM

    Probably the church/embryos deal. I wonder how many adults the church aboted in the crusades and inquisitions?

    Like (1)

  32. conceptualclarity - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by conceptualclarity Jun 3rd, 2012 at 5:50AM

    A lot fewer than the number of adults aborted by Communists in the 20th century.

    Like (1)

  33. EarthlingWise - 41-45 years old

    Posted by EarthlingWise May 18th, 2012 at 1:11PM

    Although I think I would support stem cell research, I must say I still have a bad feeling about it, when you've had a child, you've seen how those cells evolve into a being.

    Like (1)

  34. ChipmunkErnie - 61-65 years old - male

    Posted by ChipmunkErnie May 18th, 2012 at 9:20AM

    Many people think their god says it's bad, so the medical positives for millions of people should be ignored to make the world fit their religious views.

    Like (1)

  35. conceptualclarity - 51-55 years old - male

    Reply by conceptualclarity May 19th, 2012 at 1:37AM

    See my answer.

    Like (1)

Ask A Question

Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only. You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer. This page is for providing answers to the question "Why is stem cell research so looked down upon if it is proven to be effective on certain illnesses?"