Why isn't marijuana legalized? It less harmful than alcohol and our state governments would make a TON of money from it
Related Questions to Why isn't marijuana legalized? It less harmful than alcohol and our state governments would make a TON of money from it
Answers to questions are provided for entertainment purposes only.
You should never use answers to questions provided here to replace professional advice, such as from a doctor or lawyer.
This page is for providing answers to the question "Why isn't marijuana legalized? It less harmful than alcohol and our state governments would make a TON of money from it"
12 Answers to "Why isn't marijuana legalized? It less harmful than alcohol and our state governments would make a TON of money from it"
Posted by CVizion May 12th, 2012 at 11:40PM
Because entities in the government make more money importing it while it's illegal. I'm honestly starting to believe that operation fast and furious, wasn't a mistake but a way for entities in the government to sell guns illegally to drug cartels.
Like (5)
Reply by pflz91 May 12th, 2012 at 11:42PM
Like (1)
Reply by geno77 May 12th, 2012 at 11:44PM
Like (1)
Posted by TheSquirrel May 12th, 2012 at 11:56PM
It is less harmful because fewer people smoke it. I have no problem legalizing it. Tax it like alcohol. Just don't smoke it around me. That sh!t stinks.
Like (4)
Reply by maple10 May 14th, 2012 at 8:48PM
Like (1)
Posted by franklyspeaking Aug 10th, 2012 at 4:40PM
1. How could state governments make money if people can easily grow it themselves? (After all, it IS a "weed.") Tobacco is too, but it takes much more work and a more conducive climate.
sed on external things, such as the smell or bloodshot eyes) is a red herring. People can (and do) consume marijuana in other ways. Various products are on the market to clear up bloodshot eyes.
2. There is no inexpensive/adequate way (that I know of) to test for marijuana intoxication (as opposed to use). For example, someone might have "traces" of it in the bloodstream/fatty cells, but that is not intoxication. What would be the field sobriety test? Holding out a bag of White Castle burgers and seeing if the person's pupils dilate? Hiding something while they're watching, waiting 10 minutes, and then seeing if they can remember where it was hidden?
3. When people are stoned, they generally don't feel like doing a lot of hard/intellectual labor. They generally are more likely to want to listen to music, eat, hang out, etc. Corporations do not like that. Corporations want people who work, people who are "more productive." Whether or not they are happy is beside the point. It should be noted here that the "coffee break" was first introduced (and marketed) in companies because it made people "more productive"--legal "speed."
4. It takes only a 20-second attack ad against a candidate to say, "(S)he's caving in to the drug cartels!" That is much cheaper than the 2-minute ad that explains why legalization is a cheaper/wiser long-term policy.
5. Drug policy people made (and continue to make) HUGE mistakes by basing penalties solely on weight of the substance (such as pot). If someone has to pay the same penalty for selling/possessing an ounce of rope-grade hemp as for selling/possessing "Snoop Dogg's Killa Blend," how will the market trend? Exactly the way it has: toward stronger and stronger drugs (per gram/ounce). Same penalty for SDKB as for the rope hemp, but HUGE profit differentials. It's amazing that the very same people who deify the "invisible hand of the market," somehow ignore it when it comes to this issue.
6. The question regarding being able to tell if someone has been using marijuana (ba
7. Do we REALLY want amateurs using marijuana? Leave it to the professionals....
Like (2)
Posted by maple10 May 14th, 2012 at 8:45PM
It's a perception altering substance I don't care to have to drive on the highway with people high on marijuana, who cant properly judge time and distance, and I don't want to have to work around heavy equipment operators in the same condition. that we have to put up with drunks is bad enough,
Easy to tell who the pot heads are on here.
Like (2)
Reply by Arginis May 13th, 2012 at 5:33PM
Like (1)
Reply by y2kbunny May 14th, 2012 at 8:21PM
Like (1)
Posted by y2kbunny May 14th, 2012 at 8:18PM
Its simple $$$. Unlike every other substance, you can grow it yourself. Alcohol and liquor sales would be affected and rich people would lose $$$ and the government would lose tax dollars. Fewer police, states attorney, criminal lawyers, jails, clerks and etc. It might happen in ten years when the generation before baby boomers die off.
Like (2)
Posted by thx1138a May 12th, 2012 at 11:50PM
An old question that boils down to not being able to patent the active ingredient molecule by big pharmaceutical companies, timber industries would be threatened, and lots of government cops would lose their jobs and pensions along with prison guards. Maybe even state and city cops could face layoffs too.
Like (2)
Posted by DozerDan Aug 10th, 2012 at 6:06PM
First, the notion that alcohol is harmful is nonsense. Moderate wine drinking will extend the average person's lifespan by about 25%. Even heavy drinkers outlived non-drinkers in a recently published large scale study by University of Texas and Stanford University. Alcohol consumption is beneficial to humans.
Meanwhile, regular marijuana smoking has many of the same health problems that are associated with inhaling any other smoke. Its dirty, filthy, smelly, and pollutes your lungs. With that said, its none of the government's business if you want to destroy your life.
The reason marijuana is illegal happened because the FBI and many local "law enforcement" pig farms were out of work when alcohol prohibition ended. So they lobbied Congress to outlaw drugs. Marijuana was added on the theory that it caused southern black men to rape white women. That stupid racist reason is the actual reason why marijuana is illegal. The rest is history and stupidity. The pig farm makes $$ billions creating "crime" to keep their jobs.
Like (1)
Reply by franklyspeaking Aug 10th, 2012 at 10:07PM
Like (1)
Posted by Arginis May 13th, 2012 at 5:41PM
Leave it like it is,most states have decriminalized it. If it was legalized,it would most likely,for non-prescrtiption use,be restricted to ineffective swag,and taxed so much it would become just another luxury for the rich.
Like (1)
Posted by Sugardaddy8910 May 13th, 2012 at 1:23PM
If it is legalised everyone grows it in their back yards and there is no way some corporation can brand it and sell it, and govts are run by corporations from behind the curtains
Like (1)
Posted by newman360 May 13th, 2012 at 7:22AM
legalizing it would take all the fun out of it and no one would use it any more.down in vivian louisiana they have their annual red bud festival.what a gas.
Like (1)
Posted by cozyuptothefire May 13th, 2012 at 12:44AM
Keeping it illegal is brought to you by the same "logic" that alcohol should be illegal. It's as if when they made alcohol legal again, they said: only alcohol....nothing else!
Like (1)
Posted by OriginOfEmotion May 12th, 2012 at 11:52PM
stigma
Like (1)