Agree because i think women do things with more detailing... Disagree because most of the time women have too much detailing... huh... now i do not know what i just say is logical... ha ha..
A good one of either is fantastic, its fair to say.
Theres so much variation in people its hard to say..There is equal good and equal bad in both..These days the reverse sexism really annoys me..The general thinking that women are better in every way is just plain ridiculous.But at the same time i can ignore all of it and just do what i do regardless..Only problem is the limitations placed on men can leave you feeling like a second-class citizen..Stricter dress codes for one.<br />
Far less priority for mens health issues for another..Harder,dirtier,more dangerous work for men.etc..etc.
You clearly didn't live in England during the 1980s... I don't generally hold grudges, but I do against Thatcher, that damned woman ruined this country.
She was one of the "baddies"...In Australia at present there is Julia Gillard who is one of the "goodies".
In general I disagree.
I disagree that women make better leaders than men.
you mean cheer leaders offfcourse yes....
Well there would definately, definately be less wars with women in charge and the monthly bitchiness would make politics a number one tv show.
no. probably about the same.
It depends......I like Hillery Clinton.....but felt embarressed by her over emotional display on public tv....To be a great leader......sometimes you must use ur head and not ur heart.(emotions)
Yair she seems pretty good most of the time..Both the clintons i like.They seem very real and human but essentially good.
Men are naturally more inclined to take on leadership roles than women. Of course, there are women who would make fantastic leaders and there are men who would make terrible leaders. But if we're talking in generalities and statistics, men are more likely to be better leaders. It's been in their DNA for thousands of years.