Resolved Question

Should men step down and let women take over the decissions of governing the world.If so!! would there be less wars and acts of aggressian if this happened. This would also apply to religion too. After all,men have been in control of these two departments since time began.
Thanks Keith.

This is my honest opinion, and I'm going to get landblasted for it.

However, whether men like it or not, they are the natural leaders of their families, cities, states, countries, companies, and nations. It is for a reason.

A man is not primarily driven by emotions. He's driven by responsibility for his own welfare and for his family. He will protect his job, income, family, property, and interests. And, furthermore, knows the difference between an interests that produce assets, and interests that produce liabilities. And drops the liabilities. He works too hard to hold on to anything unprofitable, and cannot be emotionally attached to something unprofitable. It could be a good thing, and it could be a bad thing. However, it is mostly a good thing, because entire systems of effective and efficient government, companies, and even war were created by men.

Women, not to down them, because I love women for their emotional side. My belief and opinion, however, is that they were not created to be leaders. Men go outside the home to bring home the money, the food, pay the bills, build the house, and protect the property. Women, as a rule, do not. Unfortunately, we live in a messed up society where too many men have given up those responsibilities...and act like women.

Women are concerned with everything closest to them. That is, their own husbands, their children, the home and perhaps a garden. She's deeply and intimately involved with each facet and wrinkle, dark corner, light corner, mind, emotion, self, children, safety, freedom to be self in a safe environment. And, her primary function is to love and support her husband in everything he does.

A man will part with something that is unprofitable. If a car doesn't work like it's supposed to, and it's nickling and diming him to death, he'll trade it in. The woman, on the other hand, might love that car and not be able to part with it due to emotional attachments. She needs it for other reasons...like...for a gigantic flower pot or something...just kidding...but...it's sort of...how a woman is from what I've seen. Or, perhaps that clunk in the back seat endeared her to it.

The craziest thing I've ever seen from a woman, is that she loves. It's amazing. And she loves EVERYTHING in her life. Right down to the defective vacuum cleaner, to an abusive man. She even loves something she hates. It's a part of her, and she will not want to part with it.

To sum it all up, men who lead are simply more effective, more efficient, cut liabilities, maximize profits, and insure bargains are held up. He doesn't show any pity if a bargain is broken, he can tell a lie a mile away, and knows when he's been stolen from. He'll get it back, break a contract if it's not upheld, and steer away from a liar.

Since the emotional aspect was built into the woman as nurturers, making her the leader of a nation only expands her attachments to a world wide level, a level in which she was not designed to handle. She'll try to hang on to everything. Then, she'll become like, Sen. Nanci Pelosi.