Religious Tolerance Does Not Equal Loss Of Morality

The ignorant claim is that tolerance of other religions equals moral relativism.  Its the same ignorant claim that morality can only exist with strict, rigid rules.  That is utter crap.  If you think about it, the whole basis of all morality is the concern over the wellbeing of other people, animals, and the environment.  We know things like murder, theft, torture, violence, rape, tyranny and vandalism are wrong because they are harmful.  We consider charity, brotherhood, heroism and random acts of kindness good, because they are a service to others.  We dont need one or any religion to figure that out.  But at its basis, most religious practices are completely harmless, and many of them are virtuous.  The Hindu message of non-violence, great.  The Buddhist message against materialism-great.  The Jewish belief in Mans dignity-great.  The Christian belief in feeding the poor-great.  The Muslim belief in self control-great.  The wiccan practice of doing no harm-great.  The Native American practices of respect for the earth-great.  The new age practice of spiritual freedom-great.  The Unitarian belief in tolerance and diversity-great.  These things are all good.  Other beliefs are completely harmless.  There is no problem if people go to Priests, Rabbi's, Imams, Ministers, Elders, Shamans, healers, or spiritual guides, thats all fine by me.  I dont care if you believe in evolution or creationism.  I dont care if you believe in one single god, a trinity, or a pantheon of gods.  I dont care if you believe in Transubstantiation or consubstantiation, or other communion doctrine.  I dont care if you think you need to confess your sins to a priest or not.  I dont care whether you celebrate Passover or Easter.  I dont care if you think the Bible or the Koran is the sacred book.  I dont care if you choose to be a spiritual mystic or a follower of structured rule based religion.  I dont care if you abstain from Alcohol or from animal products.  All that, perfectly fine.  No one is being hurt.  But that does not mean everything is okay.  Certain beliefs and practices are innappropriate, like Eternal Damnation, Human Sacrifice, the Caste System, spiritual abuse, Shrunken Heads, Stoning, religious wars, terrorism, Authoritarian theocracy and excessive spanking.  These things cause harm to others.  The things mentioned previously dont. 

It seems like a lot of the intolerant Fundamentalist claim that our society thinks everything is okay except for Christianity.  If that was so, why are there so many Christmas sales?  Why are weddings held at Churches?  Why can you wear a cross shirt without being beaten up?  Because our society does not hate moderate or liberal Christians.  What people do not like is Fundamentalism.  And for good reason.  The whole basis for the belief is "Follow our religion to the very letter, or suffer in excruciating punishment forever".  That very basis already advocates harming others.  And thats exactly what happens.  Theocrats, aggressive preachers, terrorist groups, and hate mongerers make harm a virtue, and for what? being different? I dont think so.  All this talk about relativism is just a big rant about how rules are not the basis of all morality, and the whole "Anti-Christianity" is just opposition against Fundamentalist groups within the religion that advocate harm.  Al Quaeda thought that America was too morally laxed for not embracing the strictest interpretation of Sharia law, so they think they are entitled to punish America with the 9/11 terrorist attacks.  The Westboro Baptist Church think homosexuality is wrong and connected to the Military, so they think they are entitled to punish fallen soldiers by disrupting their right to grieve at the funerals.  The religious Right thinks that certain things are wrong, and therefore entitled to use political means to punish the deviants with prison.  The Church in the Middle Ages thought that Heretics were wrong, just for not conforming to orthodox Catholicism, so they though they were entitled to punish them by burning at the stake.  All these claims of Relativism are nothing than a way to chastise someone only for being different, and advocating harm for being different.  If the differences are hurting others, thats a whole other story.  But if religious practices are harming no one, then we have no business creating hostility towards them, which by default causes harm.
ratburn ratburn
18-21
1 Response May 19, 2012

There are fanatics of various kinds. Some people are wine fanatics and cigar fanatics. Some think that if men gave up smoking cigars, the world would arrive at the millennium. Women are generally amongst these fanatics. There was a young lady here one day, in this class. She was one of a number of ladies in Chicago who have built a house where they take in the working people and give them music and gymnastics. One day this young lady was talking about the evils of the world and said she knew the remedy. I asked, “How do you know?” and she answered, “Have you seen Hull House?” In her opinion, this Hull House is the one panacea for all the evils that flesh is heir to. This will grow upon her. I am sorry for her. There are some fanatics in India who think that if a woman could marry again when her husband died, it would cure all evil. This is fanaticism.<br />
<br />
When I was a boy I thought that fanaticism was a great element in work, but now, as I grow older, I find out that it is not.<br />
<br />
There may be a woman who would steal and make no ob<x>jection to taking someone else’s bag and going away with it. But perhaps that woman does not smoke. She becomes a smoke fanatic, and as soon as she finds a man smoking, she strongly disapproves of him, because he smokes a cigar. There may be a man who goes about cheating people; there is no trusting him; no woman is safe with him. But perhaps this scoundrel does not drink wine. If so, he sees nothing good in anyone who drinks wine. All these wicked things that he himself does are of no consideration. This is only natural human selfishness and one-sidedness. You must also remember that the world has God to govern it, and He has not left it to our charity. The Lord God is its Governor and Maintainer, and in spite of these wine fanatics and cigar fanatics, and all sorts of marriage fanatics, it would go on. If all these persons were to die, it would go on none the worse.<br />
<br />
Do you not remember in your own history how the “Mayflower” people came out here, and began to call themselves Puritans? They were very pure and good as far as they went, until they began to persecute other people; and throughout the history of mankind it has been the same. Even those that run away from persecution indulge in persecuting others as soon as a favourable opportunity to do so occurs.<br />
<br />
In ninety cases out of a hundred, fanatics must have bad livers, or they are dyspeptics, or are in some way diseased. By degrees even physicians will find out that fanaticism is a kind of disease. I have seen plenty of it. The Lord save me from it!<br />
<br />
My experience comes to this, that it is rather wise to avoid all sorts of fanatical reforms. This world is slowly going on; let it go slowly. Why are you in a hurry?<br />
<br />
Sleep well and keep your nerves in good order; eat right food, and have sympathy with the world. Fanatics only make hatred. Do you mean to say that the temperance fanatic loves these poor people who become drunkards? A fanatic is a fanatic simply because he expects to get something for himself in return. As soon as the battle is over, he goes for the spoil. When you come out of the company of fanatics you may learn how really to love and sympathise. And the more you attain of love and sympathy, the less will be your power to condemn these poor creatures; rather you will sympathise with their faults. It will become possible for you to sympathise with the drunkard and to know that he is also a man like yourself. You will then try to understand the many circumstances that are dragging him down, and feel that if you had been in his place you would perhaps have committed suicide. I remember a woman whose husband was a great drunkard, and she complained to me of his becoming so. I replied, “Madam, if there were twenty millions of wives like yourself, all husbands would become drunkards.” I am convinced that a large number of drunkards are manufactured by their wives. My business is to tell the truth and not to flatter anyone.<br />
<br />
These unruly women from whose minds the words bear and forbear are gone for ever, and whose false ideas of independence lead them to think that men should be at their feet, and who begin to howl as soon as men dare to say anything to them which they do not like–such women are becoming the bane of the world, and it is a wonder that they do not drive half the men in it to commit suicide. In this way things should not go on. Life is not so easy as they believe it to be; it is a more serious business!<br />
<br />
A man must not only have faith but intellectual faith too. To make a man take up everything and believe it, would be to make him a lunatic. I once had a book sent me, which said I must believe everything told in it. It said there was no soul, but that there were gods and goddesses in heaven, and a thread of light going from each of our heads to heaven! How did the writer know all these things? She had been inspired, and wanted me to believe it too; and because I refused, she said, “You must be a very bad man; there is no hope for you!” This is fanaticism.<br />
<br />
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Complete_Works_of_Swami_Vivekananda/Volume_5/Notes_from_Lectures_and_Discourses/On_Fanaticism