Register

I Am Christian

Paul And Muhammad - They're Like Brothers

By: LakanDula
Written on February 4th, 2013
By: LakanDula
Age: 22-25 , Male
255 people have read this story

Your Response

By clicking "Post", you confirm that you agree to the Terms of Service of Experience Project, Inc.
58 responses
  • birdie1too

    YAWN :O

    Feb 13
    2 likes
  • justeasygoing

    This is pretty bizarre to me.Paul never worshiped a false God,Jesus did appear to him on the road to Damascus or God would not have allowed it in the Bible.You have to remember that in Timothy God say's He is the one that had the Bible written as it is.He would not have allowed false teachings in the Bible.
    Muhammad I agree with on what you say.

    Feb 4
    1 like
    • justeasygoing

      I believe what the Bible teaches and that is y choice.I do not believe anything you are saying about the apostle Paul but you can believe he worshiped who you claim but not according to his own words.He claimed to be an apostle of Jesus and a worshiper of Jesus Father who is God.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      I do not care whether you believe me or not, because it is no significance. Your ignorance does nothing and that isn't my fault that you are obssessed with keeping yourself locked up in your little comfort zone of ignorance.

      You don't believe in God you believe in your false apostle Paul and his God Mithra.

      A believer in Paul = a believer in Muhammad

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      Apparently you skipped the book of Acts because in that book the other apostles welcome Paul as a legitimate apostle and Jesus spoke to Ananias to go t Saul(Paul) and heal him because Jesus has chosen him as an apostle to the nations,kings,and the sons of Israel.That is enough proof for me.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      No...the [real] apostles treated Paul as a "brother" and a friend, but NEVER an apostle.

      You have misquoted scripture.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Watcha talking bout Willis? Paul disagreed with the Apostles and got into arguments with them!

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      I didn't misquote anything ,Galatians 1:1 opens with "Paul,an apostle through Jesus Christ and God the Father".no misquote.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Galatians is Paul's book! Gee, when will you quote me something that doesn't come from Paul's lying mouth? Galatians, Romans, and Corinthians are all Paul's books!

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      still...self-proclaimed.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      So I guess it would have been impossible for Jesus to have called him to be an apostle on the Damascus Road.

      An apostle, from Classical Greek ἀπόστολος (apóstolos), meaning "one who is sent away",[1] is a messenger and ambassador. The purpose of such "sending away" is to convey messages, and thus "messenger" is a common alternative translation.

      So we really are all apostles as Jesus commissioned us to go and spread the gospel making DISCIPLES unto ALL NATIONS.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      Timothy says all of the Bible was inspire from God so it doesn't matter what book we pick it is still from God and would God allow 11 books from Paul if he were a fraud?I think not.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      Yes that is true but specifically Jesus chose Paul as an apostle during Bible times and Jesus said he would put him to much work and he did.This story here claiming Paul is no different muhammad is silly and Paul not being commissioned by Jesus himself is baseless.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul wrote his works in about 50 B.C and the real works were put togehter by 70 B.C that means the Apostles never knew Paul's works! because the church of the Apostles rejected him becuase the knew he was a false prophet

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Yes God would allow it to test his people! It's called "gift of discernment". In Revelation, God allows the Antichrist to decieve millions, he allowed Satan to rebel and decieve 1/3 of angels.

      Jesus never chose Paul, maybe Mithra/Sananda Immanuel did but Jesus never did, Paul and Muhammad are the same.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      This is silly and dumb and you may believe what you want but Paul wrote all his books between 51 ce and 64 ce and all were acceptable to God because God is the one that protects His Bible and He allowed Pauls words to be included in the Bible.Learn your Bible better before spouting off silliness.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      hahaha...God never "protected" the bible if he did that...there wouldn't be 50,000 versions of the Bible floating around the markets with their owns books added and taken out.

      OOPS......

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      No wrong !There are plenty od manuscripts that have been unearthed and funny thing most Bibles read just like all those old manuscripts.There are thousands of teaches from people that are not based on the Bible for example the apostle Paul was not an apostle of Jesus but those who know the truth dont fall for such misleading nonsense.
      Anyway this has been fun,your words have not even slightly swayed me but not really worth my time anymore.Enjoy your day and have fun explaining to God on Armageddon why you discredited one of God's own messengers.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • justeasygoing

      Paul did not write books before Christ was born.Christ was born at the turn of the century,Paul became an apostle after Jesus ascended to heaven.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      "Paul became an apostle after Jesus ascended to heaven."

      yeah, in order to become an apostle...You NEED to to have been with the Lord, DURING HIS FOOT ministry on earth, he never "Appeared" to ANYBODY!

      the Lord was with John and Matthew when they foretold Revelation's events.

      try again man.

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      I find it intriguing that you're trying God with yourself just like your hero and false apostle Paul/Muhammad...haha, after all, we all know what Matthew 7:1 says about judging! Only God can judge!

      Feb 4
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      give me the verses, the exact. it seems to me like your little friend justeasygoing, your misquoting scripture to make it look like Paul was an apostle.

      or could it be...THAT HE APPEARED TO ALL THESE PEOPLE ON FOOT and some some freak vision?

      oopsies...try again. again, 1 Corinthians is Paul's book and unless you can give me proof WITHOUT ANYTHING from Paul's own lying mouth, then Paul is and will always be a false apostle.

      Feb 5
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      I have not misquoted anything, it is right in the scripture
      Matt 28, start with verse 8-20
      Mark start with verse 9--20
      Luke 24 start with verse 13--49
      John 20 start with verse 11-29
      Acts 1start with verse 1-3
      1 Corinthians Paul is stating what has already been stated in the gospels of Jesus appearing to Peter and the others. So Paul is not lying about the fact.

      Luke 10 start with verse 1

      Feb 5
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul is lying, and of course he'd make everything up in the Corinthians' books just to qualify himself as an apostle. Those verses were talking about ACTUAL FOOT visitations by Jesus Yahushua himself, not some doop visions.

      You are clearly misquoting scripture.

      Feb 5
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      Again I have not misquoted. You stated that He didn't appear to anyone, and the scriptures plainly say He did appear to multitudes of people after His resurrection.
      The scripture does not say He appeared in a vision.

      Again Paul is stated what has already been stated in the gospels, Paul wasn't making it up.

      Feb 6
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      again..."witnessed" from a third-hand ACCOUNT. not self-proclaimed. Moses never said, "God appeared to me from a bush, I AM NOT LYING" like Paul says at the end of every sentance.

      Sure I admit he appears to people..but he sure doesnt appear to false prophets. End of convo, you are simply wasting my time bringing back and forth cuz you are a too-stubborn headed Mithra-believer like Paul.

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      From who's account doesn't matter. The fact is God appeared to him in the burning bush, and Moses HEARD A VOICE. You are trying to say He doesn't appear to people, He doesn't appear in light or in a voice and the scriptures say otherwise.

      Now you admit He appears to people but only after scripture proved it.

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      HA! you admitted to me Paul just self-proclaimed it! and yes it matters whos accounts cuz if your an idiot calling yourself prophet...who else would be a witness other than yourself?

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      re-read the number 2 bullet again

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      It does matter, apostle means what it means. In Jesus times apostle means one who is sent out. Today we don't use the word apostle we use the word missionary.
      There are many things Jesus did which were not included in the scriptures we have because a book could not contain them all. So there could have very well been others Jesus appointed that were not written about.

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      Appearing to them and sending them out are to different things. Jesus may appear to you, but He may not call you to leave home and go out to spread the gospel. He may want you to spread the gospel right where you live.

      Disciples are followers of Christ, and all believers are disciples, but again they may be called to leave home to spread the gospel.

      Feb 8
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      No it doesn't matter. The fact the Jesus appeared to all these people, some like Moses and Noah became messangers yet half of them never called themselves apostles proves to the fact that Paul was not an apostle and there was 12 of them ONLY. Jesus "sent" these apostles out for a reason that is because they were WITH HIM ALIVE when he was on Earth.

      there is a reason why there are TWELVE gates to the New Jerusalem all containing the names of the 12 apostles, not Paul.

      Again, you are taking this full circle. The fact of the matter is Paul thought he saw Jesus using his own lying mouth.

      I am well aware there's other people out there...you know, like Enoch and btw...he never called himself an "apostle" either yet he walked hand in hand with the Lord. you don't know that one don't you? As if Revelation hadn't made it clear that "anyone who adds or takes out" from the Bible is blasphemous. the only reason why they used the word "apostle" was because almost all of them were GREEKs, descended from the Tribe of Dan. Paul was from the Tribe of Benjamin and you know what Genesis 49:27 says about the Tribe of Benjamin "Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil"

      Greek has existed before Jesus was even born...I never see the word "apostle" being used, yet Yahweh sent many messangers out like Moses and Enoch. NOBODY but the twelve disciples have the right to use it and anyone after James trying to call themselves an apostle is a lyiing piece of filth. you are making this more and unnecessarily complicated, and this argument should have ended at the fact that Paul thought he was 13th apostle.

      anyways today is the (true) Sabbath, so please don't waste my time with your pro-Paul pro-Pharisee propaganda. Paul is nobody other than a Pharisee.

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      In Matthew 23:9 Jesus tells people to NEVER call anyone on Earth their "Father" in the spiritual sense.

      Apparently your little Mithra-worshipper Paul thinks he's god by telling people he's the Father in 1 Corinthians 4:15.

      In Galatians 1:18 Paul clearly denies ANYTHING of Yahweh or the real 12 apostles by throwing a tantrum against real believers. "If we or an angel from heaven preach ANY OTHER GOSPEL to you than what we have preached to you LET HIM BE A CURSE".

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      you want more proof Paul was a hypocrite tried to replace God with himself?

      In Galatians. 5:2 Paul rejects circumisions yet he does it to Timothy in Acts 16:3.

      Paul worships idols and sacrifices meat to them (Acts 15:28:29) yet Jesus clearly said not to do this (Revelation 2:14)

      Paul-Saul's eyes are described like a scaly serpents (Acts 9:18)

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      So all your arguments are irrelevant. I have given you scriptural PROOF that Paul denied EVERYTHING and all the laws of the BIble. which again just proves his falsehood

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul Satan thought he was Jesus

      2 Corinthians 12:11 "In nothing was I behind the most eminent (JESUS CHRIST)...in signs and mighty deeds"

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      You wanna talk about "linguistic" origins eh? Let's do it. Paul is from TARSUS which is TRSV in Hebrew. T=400, R=200, V=6 and S=60 - 6.6.6.

      in GREEK the letters LATIENOS add up to this numeric falue 666 (30 1 300 5 10 50 70 200 = 666). In Acts 22:25 guess what Paul is? A ROMAN. A LATIN.

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul-Saul was completely rejected by the real 12.

      But when SAUL had come to Jerusalem HE tried to join the disciples; but they were ALL AFRAID OF HIM AND DID NOT BELIEVE THAT HE WAS A DISCIPLE" Acts 9:26

      In .Acts 15:12-13 James tells people not to listen to Paul and Barnabas (another false apostle).

      Paul preaches complete lawlessness in Acts 20:24. 2 Corinthians 11:4. 1 Corinthians 10:23

      Paul is a pharisee who gives HIMSELF titles.
      (Ephesians 4:11. Philippians. 1:1. 1 Corinthians 4:15)

      again..anyone can claim to be an apostle or "sent out".

      want proof of what it takes to qualify as an apostle of the Lord?
      Peter the real apostle aready said in Acts 1:21-22, a test that Paul, Barnabas and Luke from the blasphemous Church of Epesus FAILED.

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      It seems to me that you consider yourself a "guru" - which just really means a frustrated old pharisee like yourself.

      Only a pharisee would ever grant a false prophet a title such as an "apostle" whilst completely ignoring the bullshit he does such as replacing god, denying Jesus, everything that Paul-Saul the Pharisee the did.

      Feb 9
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      If you are trying to imply Pauls name equals the anti Christ. Well we know the anti Christ has not yet come, so Paul couldn't be him.

      No I am not guru, and guru does not mean pharisee. 2 different religions there.

      However it is apparent that you are confused on a great number of things.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      1 John 2:18-19 ""Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, in order that it might be shown that they all are not of us."

      Paul was an Antichrist...idiot.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      in case you're too dumb to read let's quote that again 1 John 2:18-19 "even now many antichrists have arisen"

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      There is only one anti christ that will bear the mark.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      AAAAHAA! you've denied scripture AGAIN! just like Paul.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      Revelation was written after the death of Paul. Revelation is about future events, not past ones. Paul was already dead, in the past.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Oh yeah, but Matthew and John wasn't. apparently you didn't read. Jesus already told people "The Antichrist is coming, but many antichrists have already risen" in 1 John 2:18-19.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul ADMITS HIS A LIAR....again

      Romans 3:7 "If through MY LIE God's truth abounds to His glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner"

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      The scripture says only 1 will bear the mark of 666, which you said was Paul. So how could Paul bear the mark when he was already dead when John had his vision( which you also said the lord didn't speak to people in visions).

      John clearly describes the antichrist as he who denies that Jesus is the Christ and who denies the Father and the Son. He is not talking about the one who bears the mark.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Nope! he already said in 1 John 2:18 that many will already come!

      oh and by the way..Paul's name and title does contain 666 in Greek and Hebrew numerological sources as I already discussed......Paul already denies Jesus and I'm not gonna repeat those for you cuz you constantly ignore them

      Again...you waste my time with EXCUSES.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      Paul was a JUDAS, A PHARISEE, AN ANTICHRIST, there's many things he qualifies but they all have one thing in common - they are ENEMIES OF JESUS.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      numerology is associated with the occult, we already know you follow the occults.
      Revelation says 1 will bear the mark, not many.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      how?

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      =o YAAWWNNNNN........there are "antichrists" and there is "THE Antichrist".

      John's Gospel said as thus saith the Lord, NO IF ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      now you are simply believing what you choose....

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      There is only one who will bear the mark of 666, who you said was Paul. Paul is in the past, the bearer of 666 is in the future.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      NOPE! you are putting your own beliefs above a gospel of John! that ends it!

      Satanists and SAtanic-worshippers all bear the 666 and love that number, so it was associated of with Paul-Saul of Tarsus.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • hebrews132

      Not my beliefs but what the scripture says. I do not see anyone walking around with 666 on them. And most of the world is still able to buy and sell without having the mark as stated in Rev.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    • LakanDula

      yeah and Christ already told John in that verse I gave you that many antichrists have already risen.

      so yes, you did reject. no ifs ands or buts about it.

      anyways, from this point on i might block you since you are vehemently wasting my precious time trying to feed me with endless nonsense and irrelevance. it clear to me that you are a supporter of the false apostle, but that's okay. it's free will. so get a ******* life.

      Feb 12
      1 like
    53 More Replies