Circumcised And Proud:)It seems the anti-circ activists love to promote the idea tha circumcision is dangerous and useless. Well is it? First, if we lived in a perfect world
withought harmful viruses etc.and if body parts such as a foreskin never caused a person any problems, then maybe we could consider circumcision harmfull
and useless. Sorry but its not a perfect world. Viruses such as HIV,Herpes and HPV all have an easier time entering the inner surface of the foreskin
either through small tares in the lining or because of the immune response from such cells as Langerhan. Unfortunately an immune response to a virus such as
HIV and Herpes is pretty much the same as the Trojan horse, and once its in its there to stay.
As we all know, a number of studies show each of these viruses to be more common in the uncircumcised. Circumcision is not a cure all but it is considered
by many to be a preventive measure. Yes condoms provides protection from these viruses, but you are living in a fantasy world if you think for one second
that people always use them.
Have you ever checked into unplanned pregnancies for example, especially among young people, i think this speakes for itself.
From day one after an infant is circumcised, benefits start. UTI's are less frequent for the first year of life, phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, thrush,
cancer, frenulum tares (which can be very painful involving a lot of blood ) can all be either reduced or eliminated for a lifetime. As for ceanliness,
well, thats a no brainer.
******, and fermented urine can form under the foreskin within a couple hours especially if small amounts of urine get trapped and start mixing with oils
and shedded skin. Many reports describe the smell as repulsive.
If anything can be done to help give someone and better defence against any these problems then maybe it should be considered more and parents should start
requesting it more often.
If those of you who believe it should be the right of the individual to make this decision when he is an adult, instead why not give your son all the
information he needs to partially or fully restore his foreskin, or at least keep the glans and upper shaft covered through stretching, taping etc.. according
to anti-circ activists there are a lot of men/boys doing this and are happy with the results.
So if you can get all the benefits from your at birth circumcision for the first part of your life, say until your late 20's and 30's then go ahead and try
restoring..(even keeping the head and upper shaft coverered for periods of time will increase sensitivity ) many of these guys say the sensation increases
and sex etc. is better or different at least, many of them also say that restored men (or newly resensitized) are better off than uncircumcised men
because they can compare the differences and appreciate it more than if they were uncircumcised all their lives. Its like having a totally different
feeling penis and /or looking penis..so from then on a whole new enjoyable experience for the rest of your life....almost like a brand new start.
So being circumcised at birth (best time done) then living for 25-45 years of your life, and getting all the benefits from it then increasing your sensitivity
and appreciating it more, even moreso than an uncircumcised male, then you get the best of both worlds. sounds like the plan to me..
So don't feel as though you were violated because of being circumcised at birth (withought your permission).. instead realize all the benefits it has provided for you
plus the sex and ************ during your younger years were pretty damn good:) I never heard of a young circumcised guy complain. (If he does its mostly
in his mind...mostly because of the negative untruths the anti-circ groups spread everywhere.)
Reap all the benefits of being circumcised and regaining sensitivity and appearance later in life and be greatfull..
and pass on a circumcision to any son we have in the future..
Its worked for me:) ask any questions you need to.