Register

I Am Clairaudient

Clairaudiance

By: jazzy1121
Written on February 12th, 2013
By: jazzy1121
Age: 22-25
102 people have read this story

Your Response

By clicking "Post", you confirm that you agree to the Terms of Service of Experience Project, Inc.
1 response
  • petul

    I know I am not the only one who can dispute the validity of esp. I know I am not the only one who can use behavioral and cognitive science, to show how the validity of esp is in pattern recognition and further show that it is cause and effect of human behavior, but it is how. If you sit in a room 5 days a week for 4 hours a day and study patterns of shapes, know which one is coming and guess correctly, there you have it, esp, your memory remotely viewed the answer. There isn't a person I have ever met who would honestly deny wanting some kind of supernatural power to know and just be. Yeah they might lie and turn to god or jesus, but that religion itself can be picked apart like leftovers and portions refused as they make no sense, yet people believe. People will believe until they read up on plants and find some kind of mystical meaning for them, take them to well better, find illegal drugs cause delusion, psychiatric illness, and wind up medicated with diabetes. Pseudo science, parapsychology, should be left to those who can understand it as a history, and that is it, because when people get a hold of it they view it like solid fact, solid historical fact and forget it is presented as a theory, and something that in the early stages can be used to diagnose a paragraph example not a person, when studying. Then again people believe that divine infallible cures can come from jesus and god etc, so there is no solve all for any of it. One just has to believe because they choose to, when it comes to religion. History has to be understood as history, theory not as fact, but a history of theory. If I could only write a book leaving people with education to lean on and a healthy diet, and new age fun to study to believe in what is learned only, strictly academics, to fuel their wonder, with an explanation of pseudoscience as a historical thing, encouraging healthy imagination, I would. But trying is about like risking them, and I am not willing to do that, but perhaps it would be a useful final product. Just a general comment.

    Feb 16
    1 like