Post

Killing Is The Way To Survive. Darwin's Theory, The Law Of The Strongest

You could say in some way I am an philosopher, I consider myself as a thinker with knowledge of the world. I state that you only live a real life when you think about life. We live in a world that is dying because of the environment and over population. The air is full of toxic gasses and the pole caps are melting. This is because of our own faults, what we of course already know. The everlasting ways of production provide us with the products we need, I don't want to say that we could do different because we can't. We need products for every day use but the problem is that there are to many people who need those products so mass production is needed. The world is full of people, If you ask me to many people. As a matter of fact there are so many people in this world that there are almost no jobs available. I consider that there will be a day in the future that there will be so many people on this earth that all the natural recourses will be not enough anymore. that moment will come sooner that we can effort.

Once a very wise man whom we all know said, "It is the law of the strongest" this man was Darwin. He stated that all the living creatures who survived the ages did this simply because they were stronger. Let the weak die so the strongest could survive. But when I look at what we human do I think we are doing it all wrong.

You see, we humans like the word freedom. But what does freedom means ? does it mean that we can do what ever we want ? No.. Does it mean that you could live wherever you want ? no.. I consider this strange because this is the meaning of freedom in is true definition..

Now you think were do I wanna go with this blog, well...

The world is growing full, there will be a time that there are so many humans in this world that it will be impossible to survive. I know of course that my theory never will be allowed but that doesn't mean that it isn't true.

When in a forest there are to many deers, the local government decide that there must be some hunters whom will kill some deers so the other deers will have more food to survive. If they don't do that, there will be no food, so they will die all together.

It is illegal to kill, but is it illegal to kill in order to survive ?

I live in Europe, and from what I know there are more people than there are jobs, there is to much production what makes the environment bad.

Think of this, there are allready to many people and to less jobs at this time. Consider I am not an anti-semite but what would be our situation now if Adolf Hitler didn't start a world war and did not had killed al those innocent people in his holocaust.

The amount of dead people by this holocaust was about 10 to 11 million people. lets do some math.

Lets say all those 10 million people did survived, and half of those ten million people would be woman.
lets say that those 5 million woman and 5 million man would start a family by making couples of two, we would have 5 million little families, lets say all those 5 million families would get 3 kids in a time period of 25 years and 25 years later their children would make 3 kids after making couples. If that would be so ( this is pure in theory) then those 5 million couples would give birth to two generations who will carry the amount of 22500000 people, 22,5 million people that is and they would have children to.

I don't want to say that the second world war was a good thing, but I do consider the possibilities of a very big problem if this war didn't happen.

I think this theory is at function to our own race to.

Kill those who are to weak in order to survive..

We live and let live but I'm sure that it would be natural to let live and let die.

I hope I will get many reactions because I am curious about this theory.
deleted deleted 26-30 1 Response Oct 7, 2011

Your Response

Cancel

Well, I must say that I am impressed that this thesis was stated. It seems to be commonly accepted that such theses are wrong, but what you just said is right. At some point we won't have enough food and water for all. This point is reality for other continents, for example in Africa the people have to fight for the right to survive. Today the world is ba<x>sed on the pain and suffering of others, we can live in wealth because others suffer for it. But at some point Europe will die, just like Africa does. When nothing but deserts and wastelands will be left the humans will have to fight for what is left. At that point the weak ones will die out automatically because they won't be able to get their food and water.<br />
<br />
If we don't destroy the planet with a great nuclear war first, that is. Your theses about WWII is also right, I don't appreciate the reason why Hitler started it or his unfair practices, but it is right that there are too many humans in this world and that this won't last forever. Thus I agree with you, we are going to go extinct if we go on like we do. We have lost our connections to the nature because of the modern machines etc., but we are not able to go on this way forever. <br />
<br />
If there was to be a law that would limit the growth of humanity so that the birth rate would be less than the death rate, but since such laws would be seen as inhuman they wouldn't be made. So what is left for us to do? Preparing for the day when everything collapses. I think this is just the way we are destined to go, no matter what is stated in the newspapers, because we will lose everything if we go on the way we do, not just our conveniences but our kind and this entire planet.