Register

I Am For Gun Control

Let's Be Real

By: ronanp
Written on July 20th, 2012
By: ronanp
Age: 51-55 , Male
368 people have read this story

Your Response

By clicking "Post", you confirm that you agree to the Terms of Service of Experience Project, Inc.
36 responses
  • tdo3811

    let not let the facts get in the way, in Aurora Co. where my daughters friend was in the theater next during the shooting. There was a no concealed weapons aloud sign on the door and that is why he picked that theater. The ar-15 shoots a 223 or 5.56 round it shoots a 55 grain (weight) bullet they travel between 2600- 3400 feet per second it produces 1200 foot pounds. A 30-06 the most popular deer hunting round is a much larger 150 grain bullet travels at 2500-2800 feet per second and produces around 2500 foot pounds the point is any gun will kill the AR is a light round with a bad rep kind of like a pit bull crazy people get a pit bull bad things happen we have to do some thing with the law so doctors and police can talk without getting sued.

    Feb 15
    1 like
  • YourMysticGirl

    Just had to revisit these after whats happened in Newtown - I know someone who has suffered there because of this in Newtown. I wondered if anyone who thinks it's okay to have weapons made easily to everyone, if the same thing happened to someone in your family you may think differently.

    Dec 22, 2012
    1 like
  • angryguy77

    Are you saying you want the gov to make more laws to protect us from gun violence? Is this the same gov that allowed hundreds of guns to be used by criminals in Mexico and resulted in Brain Terry's death that you speak of?

    Jul 27, 2012
    3 likes
  • ronanp

    @solo: downward trend yes, yet STILL as much as ten times higher than the rest of the civilized word. Your explanation for that is ... ?

    Jul 26, 2012
    1 like
  • rredrick

    I feel that a gun is like a spare tire in your car, you hope that you never have to use it, but its there if you need it.

    Jul 26, 2012
    3 likes
  • rredrick

    armor piering bullets would have been for someone to stop the shooter at Aurora

    Jul 26, 2012
    2 likes
  • solowing

    You are aware that it is illegal to own a machine gun (fully automatic) for the vast majority of America's populace (lots of bureaucracy to get the necessary permits, costs lots of money as the legal automatics are rare and therefore valuable), and has been since 1934 (The FBI got tired of mobsters with tommy guns.), right? Most hunting rifles are (body) armor (and motor vehicle) piercing with a standard bullet, and in fact have more powerful bullets than the average assault rifle. To ban semi-automatics would be to all but ban handguns (which are almost all semi-auto, because they're better than revolvers). If one excludes handguns, all it takes is a bit of molded plastic to turn it into a very easily handled shoulder-fired weapon, and a bit of sheet metal and spring to extend a magazine. A light semi-auto hunting rifle with a bit of modification is an assault rifle (or, with a little bit of work, one can make a mechanical action fire nearly as fast).



    Let us be realistic. The perpetrator in this case spent months preparing for his rampage, and had the brains to rig his apartment (which had to be disarmed in a controlled detonation by EOD) to explode (We see the effectiveness of bomb control.), and the surplus of body armor suggests a big budget. Given that, there is no reason to believe he wasn't capable of acquiring a semi-auto carbine, a shotgun, and a couple of pistols illegally had it been required of him.



    There is nothing that can be done to disarm crazies with massacre on the mind. Anders Brevik lived in Norway, which regulates guns precisely as you suggest. As far as America goes, we are among the most complex and diverse societies on the planet, with a violence problem that goes far deeper than guns (Children, for example, are at greater risk of dying of abuse at their parent's hand in America than any other first world country.). I'd argue that our population owning enough small arms for every man, woman, and child is more a manifestation of that than the cause. As it is, those 300 million guns are a genie that isn't going to be put in a bottle anytime soon (even if trying to take them doesn't provoke armed rebellion, a 99% success rate still leaves plenty of guns for the wackos), and the words "gun control" are the answer to every gun store owner's prayers, as those two words (or the election of a Democrat who is merely expected to utter them) invariably causes sales to skyrocket.



    I am also a bit surprised that not one journalist/writer/whatever has noted that, while we are better armed than ever before, and in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression, our murder rate remains in a downward trend, and is lower than any point from Reagan on. One cannot be real and fail to note that living in America is currently safer than any time in the past 20-30 years.

    Jul 23, 2012
    4 likes
    • DenteAvvelenato

      I tend to think its a cultural "fear mongering" epidemic which encourages and feeds the american penchant for uber violence.

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • JoeyPFoxx

      I agree with both of you... 100%

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
  • JoeyPFoxx

    I don't own a gun. I am not a gun rights advocate. I think it's silly to own a high powered rifle.



    That said, guns don't kill people. People kill people. The Oklahoma City bombing was carried out with fertilizer. Are we going to regulate the purchase of fertilizer? What about kitchen knives that are longer than 6 inches? (I have 4).



    What we need is to take a good long look in the mirror as to why we have so many young people who are killing themselves and their peers, why we have an obsession with instant fame. FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is running rampant to the point where people don't talk to their neighbors anymore because there's something way more interesting on the internet.



    This kid had NO warning signs. NONE. He was a great student who experienced life's first struggle as a graduate student. He was in the process of getting kicked out of school. I'm guessing that, for him, failure wasn't an option. So, he buried himself in creating an artificial reality for himself. He snapped.



    We all need to own this.



    More regulations won't protect us from each other. We need to talk to each other.

    Jul 23, 2012
    2 likes
    • ronanp

      Talk to each other? You are kidding right? I started by saying there is no way to prevent these things. They will happen. But we have abpout the lightest gun control laws in the world and some of the highest murder rates. You can't blame popular culture, which is often done. The rest of the world is watching the same movies, tv shows, playing the same violent games. I am not saying ban gunns. Hell no. But what reasonable controls can we put in place to help prevent.

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • Sylphy

      Pssst... Ronan... you know when you put alka seltzer in water and it fizzles...? Well, your story is fizzling now...

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • ronanp

      I'm going for altoids in the coke battle with this story, faerie

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • DenteAvvelenato

      Actually other countries aren't consuming the same media ... and America doesn't have lax gun control in relation to many countries.

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • JoeyPFoxx

      And no, I'm not kidding. Norway is a classic example of a society that has some of the strictest gun control legislation AND one of the most effective prisoner reform programs and was still victim to this kind of violence. Government regulation won't fix this. Only people talking to people can fix this.

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • ronanp

      True that happened in Norway .... And it it was a complete anomaly. This type of thing is common in the US unfortunately. I said in this piece, there is no magic bullet, no one thing that can make these type of things a thing of the past. But are there things, small reasonable changes, that can help reduce the murder rates in the US, some of the highest in the word (see earlier stats)? Why is it that any talk of change is a challenge to the constitution (by an obviously socialist bent on destroying the good old US of A.). And, Penny, for the love of god, who's suppose to be doing this talking....?

      Jul 26, 2012
      1 like
    3 More Replies
  • DenteAvvelenato

    The right to bare arms goes back to the paranoia or clever forethought depending on who you ask ... For American's to have arms so that if necessary they can form militias to either protect themselves or if needed over throw a corrupt government regime ... Of course our founders likely were overly influenced by their recent past... The civil war and freedom from The English ... I wonder if they would have written it as they did had they realized what it would devolve into in the future ...



    That said I don't know that any amount of gun control wwould stop homicidal maniacs ... This particular type of villain usually smart enough to find and exploit weaknesses and loopholes ... This thug had no record and did get the items legally (passed background check and waited the days required) he didn't send out any typical red flags .... And to me this only makes the incident more scary ...



    Really though in practice the idea of stricter gun laws really don't seem like they will help... Because people who engage in gun violence are typically people who have no problem with breaking the law... So laws will only affect those people who are law abiding and those people aren't the ones murdering people ....





    I think people need to start being taught about the value of all life instead of this whole "it's all about me " groupthink that's passed off as a mantra to happiness

    Jul 23, 2012
    2 likes
    • ronanp

      I agree with you, nothing can ever end these kind of things. People seem to forget we are animals and unfortunately act like them occasionally. I disagree with you that some level of gun control wouldn't help. And statisics in other countries that have gun control also argue against you (I posted in an eearlier response to Mystic). I think od it this way. If that creaton enter the theater packing 3 standanrd weapons, not sani-automatics, is there anyway he would have lilled and maimed 70 people. I kinda doubt it. It would have been a tragedy but the level of carnage would be different. That's all I'm saying. Give me a single reason a US citizen needs a semi=automatic in ordinary life.... ONE.

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • DenteAvvelenato

      The creep had one semi automatic and a regular handgun and regular rifle ... His semiautomatic actually jammed ... Without missing a beat he used his handgun and rifle ...

      America has gun control so maybe what causes other countries to do better isn't their gun control but something cultural ...

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
    • DenteAvvelenato

      Just to be clear I'm not in favor of guns ... But as stated previously the constitution allows American citizens to bare arms so that they may protect themselves and allows them the ability to form militias ... The implication being that they should have firepower that could effectively fight in a army like manner ...

      Jul 23, 2012
      1 like
  • ronanp

    Thanks Harlequins and Luna for your thoughtful responses. I kinda expected to get splamed for the piece ... was itching for the fight a bit as well... Thank you for contributing.

    Jul 23, 2012
    1 like
  • lunadelobos

    I am sorry this is probably not what you want to hear and this is coming from a Canadian gal, but I think your constitution or whatever it is which gives any one the power to take a person's life so flippantly should be revised.



    For heaven's sake something should be revised; folk have WAY too much POWER to wield weapons and take lives, it's like a nightmare which as far as i can tell, tragically, has no signs of abating...Something's gotta give.



    How many more murders will it take, I just wonder when I watch TV coverage of US massaces, always.

    IS ease which allows people to obtain the weapons in direct correlation/ratio with the number of killings?



    I suppose that if an intruder went at me with a weapon I would hesitate very little to fire a weapon to protect my life or the life of my family..wow huge and difficult questions here.



    In general I think guns should be banned , period, from everyone but that is another world I am dreaming about, not this reality but a Shangrila which may never come to exist...? Or like John Lennon said

    "I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one."

    Jul 23, 2012
    2 likes
  • Mary1283

    On my way home from work yesterday I was listening to the talkie, talkies on the radio, and I had the thought that it will turn out that this guy is crazy. Some sort of delusional mental condition has on set and led to this. That's what happened with the terrible shooting in Arizona and other places. So, how do we identify this on setting condition in people and separate them from weapons and get them the help they need?

    Jul 21, 2012
    2 likes
  • Gyummy

    I too have been to Aurora visiting friends who lived there a while ago. I agree with you, Incidents like this should be a HUGE concern for all parties!

    Jul 20, 2012
    2 likes
  • YourMysticGirl

    Would be interesting to compare, other countries that do not allow possession of guns to the general public except for hunting vs. the US. Most European cops do not carry guns on the street or the general public do not feel the need to carry them. Wonder what the stats are for incidents like this in those countries.

    Jul 20, 2012
    2 likes
    • ronanp

      This is from a 10-15 year old study done at Oxford University:

      During the one-year study period, 88 649 firearm deaths were reported. Overall firearm mortality rates are five to six times higher in HI and UMI countries in the Americas (12.72) than in Europe (2.17), or Oceania (2.57) and 95 times higher than in Asia (0.13). The rate of firearm deaths in the United States (14.24 per 100 000) exceeds that of its economic counterparts (1.76) eightfold and that of UMI countries (9.69) by a factor of 1.5. Suicide and homicide contribute equally to total firearm deaths in the US, but most firearm deaths are suicides (71%) in HI countries and homicides (72%) in UMI countries.

      Little dated but I doubt the result would be much different today

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • YourMysticGirl

      Wow well there's our answer!!

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • ronanp

      I am a wealth of knowledge

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
  • CrazyWaterSpring

    These people are convinced that President Obama has an agenda to seize their weapons. I remind them that the President is a constitutional scholar who knows just as much about our rights to guns as any attorney the NRA has on staff. They never thought of that. Then tell them that the President is a politician who knows better than to threaten anyone's gun possession and ownership. (disclaimer - I own a handgun, rifle and a shotgun. All are legal by Texas law. I also hold a concealed handgun permit). Military grade ammo is unnecessary for the public to possess. They are paranoid.

    Jul 20, 2012
    4 likes
    • ronanp

      Thanks for the post. I don't own guns, don't feel the need and don't hunt, but as I said earlier, wholely support your right to own them.

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • angryguy77

      Yeah crazy, this "scholar" is the same one who's breaking his oath of office daily. If he's so versed in the Constitution, he should be aware of the fact that his job is to enforce the laws, not just bits and pieces of ones he agrees with. He has no respect for our laws. You've been had my friend.

      Jul 27, 2012
      1 like
  • Quintesse

    I just recently had a discussion / fight with a person defending his right to own 24 guns including an assault weapon which apparently is a "blast" at the range. I was never going to make him understand that although I supported his right to own A weapon, that multiple weapons and assault and automatic weapons were indefensible, especially when stored in a private residence. It was an argument I was never going to win, so I walked away. So you and I have to just learn to live with stories like the Aurora one ( I have family in that city) as this, as an issue, is not going away any time soon. In fact they are trying to get Obama out of office because they feel that he is cramping their gun-toting lifestyle. God help us.

    Jul 20, 2012
    4 likes
    • ronanp

      Trust me, I am far from an Obama champion, but i find it funny the true gun nuts (the ones who won't let you question any facet of "gun" ownership) are so rabid about removing him because of what they suspect he might do if re-elected. Correct me if I am wrong, but not a thing has changed regarding gun laws in this country under his watch. i imagine them sitting their, stroking their semi-automatics, conjuring up images of the army being sent in to talk away their weapons ... it's frigging nuts.

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • Quintesse

      It IS nuts. Their obsession with needing to feel ready in the event of civil war and riots and the zombie apocalypse that are all imminent is frustrating when you are attempting to have a discussion about the need for strict regulation concerning background checks and quantity. I believe that they are making themselves look a little paranoid, and not in a good way.

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • ronanp

      Well, personally, I take the potential zombie apocalypse very serious. I'm storing up canned goods and crossbows and arrows against such a possibility. Everyone knows that gunshots will only draw more zombies to you....

      Jul 20, 2012
      1 like
    • angryguy77

      What's nuts is to never think a gov can turn against it's people. It's not being paranoid, rather is being prepared. If you want to call people who distrust gov, then I guess every single founding father was a nut job. The reason government fall into tyranny is because of people like you who say "It will never happen here".

      We may never see that here, I'm not some guy living in a bunker surrounded by canned goods looking for black helicopters. But nobody should ever be so complacent in their thinking that our liberty can't be taken away. Think about this: have we interpreted the Constitution the same way since day one? No, it hasn't. Saying that it will never happen here with 100% certainty is putting your faith and security in men. We know from history that politicians are not always trustworthy with the keys of liberty. It has been taken away all over the world, it can happen here, and if it does, I'd hope the people would have the ability to rise up and take their God-given rights back.

      Jul 27, 2012
      1 like
    1 More Reply